![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'll take the opposite tack and present a case where the second year card is just an abomination. After a fine rookie portrait, Topps decided to picture Brooksie in what could only be described as mid-sneeze form in 1958.
brooks.jpg
__________________
All the cool kids love my YouTube Channel:
Elm's Adventures in Cardboard Land ![]() https://www.youtube.com/@TheJollyElm Looking to trade? Here's my bucket: https://www.flickr.com/photos/152396...57685904801706 “I was such a dangerous hitter I even got intentional walks during batting practice.” Casey Stengel Spelling "Yastrzemski" correctly without needing to look it up since the 1980s. Overpaying yesterday is simply underpaying tomorrow. ![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Suggestions for some visually appealing non-RC HoF | ThePumaLives | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 01-07-2016 06:37 AM |
Griffey Rookie Year Signature | Luke | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 14 | 03-11-2015 12:18 AM |
Rookie of the Year Projections | Runscott | Watercooler Talk- ALL sports talk | 9 | 09-04-2014 09:40 AM |
Monster aficionados, which 5 cards from the set do you find most visually appealing? | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 42 | 09-14-2013 06:11 AM |
Most visually appealing sets | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 06-23-2005 09:22 AM |