John Rogers: Jailed

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by calvindog

I don't know for certain what the relationship is between Rogers and Nash but it wouldn't surprise me if Nash chose not to write about Rogers if indeed the two are friends or if Nash is involved in some of Rogers' business dealings. After all, he can put whatever he wants on HOS as it's his site and he contributes all the content to it. It's not like he runs an open forum with contributions from the hobby public.

Actually that's not true at all...his blog posts can be responded to by anyone, he has a lot of regular commenters including Dorothy Seymour Mills.

And the relationship between Nash and Rogers is business...Rogers loaned Nash money. Why? I have no idea, but I have suspicions.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ite...ntry-1.1632058

[calvindog]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

Actually that's not true at all...his blog posts can be responded to by anyone, he has a lot of regular commenters including Dorothy Seymour Mills.

And the relationship between Nash and Rogers is business...Rogers loaned Nash money. Why? I have no idea, but I have suspicions.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ite...ntry-1.1632058

A comments section is different than a board made up of equal contributors is what I meant.

And who believes anything Mike O'Keeffe writes? That guy? I wouldn't trust him at all. He's no good.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Originally Posted by slidekellyslide

Actually that's not true at all...his blog posts can be responded to by anyone, he has a lot of regular commenters including Dorothy Seymour Mills.

And the relationship between Nash and Rogers is business...Rogers loaned Nash money. Why? I have no idea, but I have suspicions.

http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/ite...ntry-1.1632058

On his most recent blog posts about the NYPL, there were a number of apparently fake comments attributed to Net 54 posters. EDIT TO ADD I may have missed Dan's sarcasm here if I did oops. In any event there are many familiar names "commenting" on his blog who obviously did not post the comments.

[slidekellyslide]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

On his most recent blog posts about the NYPL, there were a number of apparently fake comments attributed to Net 54 posters. EDIT TO ADD I may have missed Dan's sarcasm here if I did oops. In any event there are many familiar names "commenting" on his blog who obviously did not post the comments.

Yes, he or one of his minions took several quotes from Net54 postings and posted them as if Net54 members were responding to his "blog"...he or one of his minions like to make comments and use the name "Dan" or "Barry S."

Here is a document showing the amounts of unsecured loans he gave to Peter Nash over a short period of time. Perhaps Mr Nash can now bail out Mr Rogers?

[ksabet]

At some point don't these guys realize they will be caught?

It just doesn't make sense. Greed, arrogance, ego, lack of moral character...im guessing all the above have to be present for these jackasses to persist with their ruse. It doesn't make sense that seemingly intelligent people decide to become dumb. Although I keep overpaying for cards so go figure.