![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can find over graded cards in all TPG's holders.
How did PSA miss the brown stain on this highly prominent card? Besides the super narrow side borders? This Ruth must be the "skinny" variation ![]() |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ouch.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely, any grade company is going to make mistakes. But even so, this card is a PSA 6, not an SGC 80. the ratio between PSA and SGC is not even close. SGC would probably give this card a grade of 82-84 knowing them. And even if it was by chance the same grade, the resale value between the two is not even close. I can show you scans of T206s graded SGC 88 that are ridiculous...
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-23-2015 at 09:39 PM. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Without opening any future threads, these are enough, please look at VCP, card target, and past auction listings for comparisons between PSA and SGC.....Don't throw up when you do.....
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-23-2015 at 09:43 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Maybe even a 92, right? Do you think just because you repeat the same BS 100 times that it makes it any more believable? Comeon, Kevin, we get it: you have a strong financial interest in PSA cards selling for as much as possible. And your comments are colored by this.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-23-2015 at 09:50 PM. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I feel an ambush coming on......
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-23-2015 at 09:55 PM. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fair enough....We can agree to disagree
Last edited by CMIZ5290; 07-23-2015 at 10:04 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Relax, Kevin, you can start 100 threads about how much superior PSA is than SGC. No one listens to you anyway because everyone knows your apparent ability to feed yourself is directly related to the value of your PSA slabs.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think for Registry cards PSA sells higher. For cards that people are not foaming at the mouth for to put into their Registry sets there is little difference if any between SGC and PSA -- and personally I pay the same for such cards if they're in PSA or SGC slabs. I have thousands and thousands of Registry cards and they're all, by definition, PSA cards. Anything raw I purchase I send solely to SGC because I like the looks of the holders better, the customer service and the knowledge of the people at SGC more. And I see too many errors with PSA-slabbed cards but that may simply be a function of PSA grading so many more cards. All that being said, I'll be sending in my first submission to PSA in years due solely to their grading certain issues I have which SGC does not grade.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Scary | mintacular | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 3 | 08-04-2011 10:50 AM |
Looked Very Scary to me... | Northviewcats | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 06-28-2011 12:37 PM |
SGC problem - Scary for me | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 28 | 01-14-2008 08:08 AM |
Pretty scary.................. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 06-23-2006 03:30 PM |
this is scary | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 04-02-2005 01:38 PM |