 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
06-14-2015, 04:40 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
That very honest company PWCC had it listed as a mini card it the title. http://www.ebay.com/itm/1933-DeLong-...p2047675.l2557 Last edited by bnorth; 06-14-2015 at 05:04 PM. 
|
|
#2
06-14-2015, 05:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
My experience, albeit limited, is that the grading companies will reject for "minimum size requirement" a card that does not measure to spec, but that if they truly believe it has been trimmed it will either receive a reject as trimmed or "A" designation. The problem I have is that the rejected card looks every bit the size as the graded example posted, maybe even with a slightly larger top border, so I am puzzled it would receive this kind of rejection.
I had this card rejected as not meeting minimum size. I do not believe it is trimmed, nor was it rejected as trimmed. [IMG]  [/IMG]
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President.
|
|
#3
06-14-2015, 08:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I really don't understand what the deal is with the card. I submit cards to SGC if I submit them. Holding the card over my graded one it does appear slightly larger. If that is PSA designation for a trim then PWCC absolutely misrepresented the card. I will be sending it back if that's the case (but it doesn't look trimmed).
|
|
#4
06-14-2015, 08:18 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If it is trimmed, PSA will label it as and N1 - Evidence of Trimming
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Delong - PSA vs SGC | jg8422 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-22-2014 10:23 PM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 09:51 AM |
| 1933 Tattoo Orbit vs. 1933 Delong: Which Do You Like More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-24-2009 09:17 AM |
| WTB: 1933 Tattoo Orbit and 1933 DeLong (List Inside) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-22-2008 06:04 AM |
| WTB/WTTF: 1933 Tattoo Orbit or 1933 DeLong | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-21-2008 09:34 AM |
Hybrid Mode
