 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
06-15-2015, 05:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
I respectfully disagree with anyone who has an issue with minimum size returns from TPGs. Without that, I think we'd have even more trimmed cards in holders and likely with high grades as these cards can often be very nice in terms of centering and corners (can't imagine why cards from 80+ years ago with sharp corners would be small).
I do like the qualifier idea - I'd have no problem with that, but not all TPGs use qualifiers. Last edited by TanksAndSpartans; 06-15-2015 at 06:33 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1933 Delong - PSA vs SGC | jg8422 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 08-22-2014 10:23 PM |
| Wanted: 1933 Uncle Jacks HOF Type & 1933 DeLong's | Orioles1954 | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 03-04-2010 09:51 AM |
| 1933 Tattoo Orbit vs. 1933 Delong: Which Do You Like More? | Orioles1954 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 20 | 06-24-2009 09:17 AM |
| WTB: 1933 Tattoo Orbit and 1933 DeLong (List Inside) | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 05-22-2008 06:04 AM |
| WTB/WTTF: 1933 Tattoo Orbit or 1933 DeLong | Archive | 1920 to 1949 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 02-21-2008 09:34 AM |
Threaded Mode