![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
also a 'can get re-graded a half point higher' nice color as well....
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It looks like the serial numbers on both PSA examples shown are very low numbers. So, the cards were graded very early in PSA's existence, and they likely were more lenient with grading. If the cards were resubmitted now, they probably come back as 2's.
__________________
My new found obsession the t206! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
funny there are many ebay listings where the seller states the cards are undergraded because they were very old grades and PSA was more stringent in the beginning and suggest you can get the card re-graded higher possibly..
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
stating they were stricter in the beginning is a flat out lie. Both services have many early graded cards that do not fall within their current standards. Many "Merkle" graded SGC cards are no where near the quality they are assigned and would not cross to current SGC standards. PSA is very inconsistent on T206 grading, even more so on the early grades. And even more so on T cards graded 1-4.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This flip was issued recently or within the last 6 years. Im not sure the flip and card go together as I believe the case has been cracked and card switched. Why would someone do that for such a low dollar card? Not sure but people steal grapes everyday.
|
![]() |
|
|