PSA Grading Question

[1880nonsports]

psa also will apparently ignore some PL front and back whereas sgc hammers it each and every time. If you look at nearly all the N162's offered by heritage and graded by PSA - many had small spots of loss f/b and still received grades of 6 and 7. A few cards were on my list but I knew I probably couldn't cross them. Not meant to be a debate about grading services as the big boys are both good and bad depending on many factors and the critical eye. I'm only making an observation that on this criteria - apparently small amounts of paperloss aren't treated in the same manner.

[Harford20]

I completely agree on PSA and "small or tiny" areas of paper loss, that to my eye signficantly lowers the grade and somehow the NM 7 from PSA is documented. Really????