 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
11-12-2014, 02:35 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Not an oc
qualifier in my opinion though it looks more like a 7. From the serial number i believe this was an early grade, reholdered, Not the greatest but i do not see this as horrible either. would not probably 8 today, but both PSA and SGC have tightened their parameters since they started. Again would not be an 8 today but looks fine as a 7. I do not really scream about one grade opinion difference. There are plenty of SGC 88 cards with similar centering. Especially those graded in the late 1990's.
Last edited by glynparson; 11-12-2014 at 02:42 AM. 
|
|
#3
11-12-2014, 05:38 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Brent, I thought the borders might be just a little on the thin side, but I compared it to other graded examples, and have reversed myself.
 I do, however, feel that if the card were graded today, it would receive an OC qualifier. I think Glyn is right, that card has been reholdered.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd.
|
|
#4
11-12-2014, 05:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
What is the difference in price between the following:
PSA7 to PSA8 PSA8 to PSA9 I just get a kick out of perceived values of the labels. IMHO people place a higher value on those labels than the actual card itself.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for.
|
|
#5
11-12-2014, 06:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
grade the card not the holder
if this card was cracked..and there were honest scans...noone would pay psa 8 money.......thats why i dont care if people crack cases....
|
|
#6
11-12-2014, 09:55 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
. "A life is not important except in the impact it has on others lives" - Jackie Robinson “If you have a chance to make life better for others and fail to do so, you are wasting your time on this earth.”- Roberto Clemente
|
|
#7
11-12-2014, 10:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Just another example of the arbitrariness inherent in grading. I will never understand the wide disparities in value at the higher grades.
|
|
#8
11-12-2014, 10:49 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Definitely looks oc to me...I've seen some not this bad with the qualifier. But I think this just shows how inconsistent TPG can be and we shouldn't be surprised when examples like this show up.
__________________
T206's Graded low-mid 219/520 T201's SGC/PSA 2-5 50/50 T202's SGC/PSA 2-5 10/132 1938 Goudey Graded VG range 37/48
|
|
#9
11-12-2014, 01:14 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions.  My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/
|
|
#10
11-12-2014, 12:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
PSA 8...$23,500 PSA 9....$75,000 Been a very long time since this card sold in a PSA 9 so it could go up a lot.
|
|
#11
11-12-2014, 10:16 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Bob,
Thanks for posting the prices for the different grades on this card: PSA 7....$10.000 PSA 8...$23,500 PSA 9....$75,000 It absolutely blows my mind that someone would pay so much for a label that says PSA8 (or even 9) when you can't tell the difference between some of these cards and someone "subjectively" assigns these numbers.
__________________
fr3d c0wl3s - always looking for OJs and other 19th century stuff. PM or email me if you have something cool you're looking to find a new home for.
|
|
#12
11-16-2014, 04:32 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
