![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I have looked at ever steiner ball on ebay and not one look like the one we where shown at the start of this thread. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...86#post1324086 This is the Steiner example I was thinking of when I thought of Koufax' signature not looking like his signature of old. Ok, so after looking at it again, maybe it’s not necessarily "shaky"...but definitely off from his usual examples. Plus, there are some recent auction lots I've seen where there are some shaky ones....I think they were just PSA certed though. I can't remember which auction, but I think there's one now or one that just ended recently that had a lot of 5 or so Koufax balls and they were all pretty sloppy...but still with some good bid prices on them. Last edited by djson1; 10-07-2014 at 12:02 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
This discussion has been productive, even though I'm sensing wincing by some who think criticism is 'TPA-bashing'. There tends to be a confusion between constructive criticism and bashing - thin skin on both sides, understandably.
Personally, I think if it's an authentic signature, it should be certified. The problem is that JSA keeps his exemplars to himself, and he has approved too many clubhouse signatures for me to have any faith in his hidden exemplars. PSA, on the other hand, at least shows us exemplars. It's very helpful (to me, anyway), because I can at least tell what styles of each player's autograph they are willing to consider. I don't see any horrid Koufax signatures on PSA's site, but I do see the ugly 'old Wagner' examples. Makes me think that PSA isn't comfortable with the ugly Koufax signatures. I have more confidence in PSA than JSA, so that fact gives me no confidence in Spence's opinion on this one.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|