![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is a beautiful card at any rate. Very nice.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
That's a significant crease on the right side of the card and it's one of a few. Merits a 2 in my opinion, I wouldn't resubmit.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful card A.J. and without the usual product staining of the 14's.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
that right there is one helluva fantastic card - nice pick up!
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Technically graded correctly. My perfect kind of card to buy- Low technical grade and really great aesthetic appeal. Who cares about the number except for the registry collectors?
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
AJ, when it comes to the 1914's, all bets are off with PSA. I have the complete set, and I have 2's that look like 4's and I have 4's that could be 1's. It all depends on who submits them, among other things. I would seriously hold off on resubmitting it. As Leon points out, you have a great looking card there. Mission accomplished. As for the grade, you have your entire life to think thru whether or not to regrade. No rush at all. Besides, there is no rhyme or reason with TPG. Look at the Caldwell you got from me and the one you sold. Those grades made little sense. Expect the same nonsense again from Psa.
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
AJ,
I wouldn't want you to suffer through life with such a low grade card in your collection. Let me do you a service and take it off your hands ![]() Beautiful card and great acquisition! |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just read this post; could not say it better. Right on.
|
![]() |
|
|