![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My point has been, and will continue to be, in terms of trying to retail with the new flip, it does not look right.
I'm more concerned about the retail aspects then the inforrmation because if the flip does not stand out, then these flips might be passed by because the appear to be similar to those of 2nd rank grading services Rich |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Response | JP21 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 147 | 09-03-2013 09:01 AM |
Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 01:39 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 08:27 PM |
Interesting response to PSA grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-22-2005 03:35 PM |