![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The new flip looks infinitely better with a green border IMO. Could someone add a simple poll where you select flip a) proposed flip or flip b) same new design with green border? If not I'll do it when I get home and have access to my computer. Maybe this will illustrate the point for SGC.
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Edit: nm, Blackie is doing one already.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. Last edited by the 'stache; 05-22-2014 at 06:24 PM. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Tried to do a poll Bill but I think I jacked it up........
__________________
Successful Transactions with: CardPadre, cammb, jim, sean1125,bobbyw8469, vintagetoppsguy, mintacular, rube26105, irishdenny, brick, Robextend,dboneesq, northviewcats, wdwfan, Dhogan, quitcrab, eliminator, Harliduck, tonyo, fetamore, hcv123, Bocabirdman, Casey2296,Aplyon86 Futbowl, pwang100, GoCubsGo32, Sidepocket, jcarroll84, DanP, YazFenway08, 4reals, sflayank, frazier and many others |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What does Sean do at SGC? I didn't realize he was there.
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will add that if they did do a green border, it is immensely better. I do appreciate the response and its classy the concerns were not ignored...but as others have said, it's still really ugly. Again, the only reason for me is uniformity, so I am out. Green border, I'd be back in. There prerogative to change, mine not to support the change.
__________________
John Otto 1963 Fleer - 1981-90 Fleer/Donruss/Score/Leaf Complete 1953 - 1990 Topps/Bowman Complete 1953-55 Dormand SGC COMPLETE SGC AVG Score - 4.03 1953 Bowman Color - 122/160 76% |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Despite the new flips, I suppose cards will still float around in their holders
![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
They should find a way to put the label info on the side, like how some coins have text on their edge, and then the slabs could be near to card size with no black or cloudy clear field surrounding it. Then they could change the label design all they want and it wouldn't matter because no one would be seeing it anyway.
Glad I could jump on the site today and solve all the problems. You are welcome, card collecting world. You are welcome. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
VP of Operations.....I believe he had taken a hiatus from the company but returned several months ago.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Just curious what did they use the bar code for in the old label?
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am not an SGC rah-rah guy but do have a couple dozen slabbed SGC cards.
The old SGC labels are aesthetically nicer in my opinion. And, if the move to the new labels is a done deal (as it seems to be), SGC should at least add the green border. My wife and I have a fanciful German name for what SGC has done here: WURSENCHANGE (add the double dots over the u). The new SGC slabs are in the grand tradition of New Coke and Windows 8--they took a good thing and made it worse. People are often hired and paid to "do something." Unfortunately, often times, they make it worse. That seems to be the case here. Again, in my opinion. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Put me down as strongly disappointed in the new label. I've been a proponent of SGC from the early years (over a decade) and have been fine with all the small changes over time but feel this is a mistake. Consistent and fair grading aside, the slab appearance is what really sets SGC apart with the green border label and black insert/gasket being key. I'm fine with the changes if the green border returns, large enough at top to pull "SGC" into the border in white. I don't see why this couldn't be accomplished without compromising all other new desired features.
The old SGC slab was classy and I was compelled to grade my cards with SGC. My collection has a nice and consistent look to it. I guess that is about to change. I don't believe I will submit with the new label. I'm fine with raw cards, why spend the money if you don't like the appearance? My hope is that SGC listens to their customers and reconsiders this decision. I may change my mind with time, then again, maybe not. I'm not as passionate about coins, but have actually collected them longer than I have cards. I have collected only NGC graded coins and when their holder changed several years back I stopped submitting. The plastic insert that holds the coin being the issue, not the label. I won't buy a newer NGC graded coin. The last couple coins I need will be purchased when an example surfaces in the older holder. Anyone have an 1887 3 cent or quarter in older NGC holder? ![]() Why change when your customer base is a bunch of old curmudgeoned fanatics? A change for the worse isn't welcome (over generalization but you get the point).
__________________
Best Regards, Joe Gonsowski COLLECTOR OF: - 19th century Detroit memorabilia and cards with emphasis on Goodwin & Co. issues ( N172 / N173 / N175 ) and Tomlinson cabinets - N333 SF Hess Newsboys League cards (all teams) - Pre ATC Merger (1890 and prior) cigarette packs and redemption coupons from all manufacturers |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Building off of Bill's example, here is my recommendation.
__________________
Best Regards, Joe Gonsowski COLLECTOR OF: - 19th century Detroit memorabilia and cards with emphasis on Goodwin & Co. issues ( N172 / N173 / N175 ) and Tomlinson cabinets - N333 SF Hess Newsboys League cards (all teams) - Pre ATC Merger (1890 and prior) cigarette packs and redemption coupons from all manufacturers |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Response | JP21 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 147 | 09-03-2013 09:01 AM |
Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 01:39 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 08:27 PM |
Interesting response to PSA grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-22-2005 03:35 PM |