|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Did you see the new flip just posted above? It is anything but poorly done or 1990s, in my not so humble opinion. It looks very nice to me but would be even better with a green border. I am not OCD and don't care as much about the holders as I do the cards.....and realize it does matter more to many other collectors so am not pushing my thoughts on others. I am merely giving one opinion.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Last edited by MVSNYC; 05-22-2014 at 11:52 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'll throw in my two cents just in case SGC actually reads this.
The new, borderless flip looks like something I would print at home (i.e., cheap and unprofessional). I like how the original green border eases the stark contrast between the white label and black background. The bajillion SGC's on the new label aren't pretty either. I have a hard time believing that anyone with substantial graphic design experience could ever produce something so unappealing. In just a few minutes, members of this board have produced higher quality flips. Also, I don't like the red for Authentic. Is green + Authentic not clear enough? I think the red is distracting and doesn't add any value. I've asked a neutral third party who could careless about baseball cards and she ranks the flips accordingly (best to worst): old one, new one if it had a border, and new one without border. I see the SGC holder's current appearance as a competitive advantage. I have no clue (even after reading the response from SGC) why they would mess with success. I'm sure there are some other aspects of their business that would be a much better investment of their time/money. In summary: keep the old flip or go back to the drawing board with some new artists. Last edited by Pythonfactory; 05-23-2014 at 02:54 AM. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Yesterday, all my troubles seemed so far away
Then SGC changed their flip this way Oh, I believe in yesterday Suddenly, my cards seem half of what they used to be No green borders on the flips I see Oh, yesterday came suddenly Why the flip had to go I don't know they wouldn't say Did I say something wrong, now I long for yesterday Yesterday, TPG was such an easy game to play I liked S G C, not P S A Oh, I believe in yesterday Why the flip had to change I don't know they wouldn't say Did I say something wrong, now I long for yesterday Yesterday, TPG was such an easy game to play I liked S G C, not P S A Oh, I believe in yesterday Mm mm mm mm mm mm mm
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 05-23-2014 at 06:21 AM. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Lol.
__________________
Four phrases I nave coined that sum up today's hobby: No consequences. Stuff trumps all. The flip is the commoodity. Animal Farm grading. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nicely done McCartney!
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Have you seen the original flip? You couldn't print that at home? From what I understand the multiple SGC in the background isn't printed. It is a water mark (based on what Leon stated originally before posting the new flip). Since we couldn't see it in the scan it looks like they showed us what it essentially would look like when you can see it. I don't know what technology you have at home but the fact that you can print security water marks at home, but were unable to do a green border on a white box seems strange to me.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
__________________
Be ethical at all times. |
![]() |
|
|