![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Many companies will test market a product and study the consumer feedback before releasing it into the marketplace. I hope SGC uses this thread as their test audience and proceeds accordingly. Obviously, with near universal dislike of this label- count me among those who think it looks awful- hopefully they will reconsider the change.
Last edited by barrysloate; 05-22-2014 at 04:29 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
but i somehow like the new ones even less. Still believe Scott is probably the best grader currently working as a grader in the hobby.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I myself am not a fan of SGC grading. I prefer everything PSA. I know everyone has there opinion on whats better well what SGC is doing in my opinion looks absolutely horrible. If your a guy like me I like everything looking the same in my set and now to change the flip is a killer. I would probably pass on a card because of the flip change.
__________________
SELLING 1934 GOUDEY PARTIAL SET---CHECK OUT THE THREAD IN B/S/T |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I'm sitting here in amazement at the irony of this thread and others.
Members chime in unison about the poor quality of the holders (any TPG) and rail on about fraudulent cards being placed in cracked holders and resold, holders (or gaskets) that don't hold the cards, or holders that are too thick or too thin. Then the members in unison get all bent out of shape and chime in about a change in flips, whose sole purpose is to identify the card, certify its authenticity and assign an opinion regarding its condition. And then when it comes to the cards themselves, members generally agree in unison and chime in with the Net54 mantra "Buy the card and not the holder". If the holder and the flip are so (expletive deleted) important, more so than the card itself, isn't the mantra a bit hypocritical? Furthermore these threads tend to promote behavior seen in conga lines with someone expressing their "personal" opinion (regarding the flip for example) and then the entire symphony orchestra feels compelled to respond in harmony usually. Change is inevitable. Some will resist. Others will adapt. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but following a leader in lockstep didn't work in Jonestown for the Koolaid drinkers. Be independent, my friends, and don't get swept away by the wave of a Net54 thread. Maybe everyone should design a flip they would be happy with and post it. Do you think we would agree on which one is the best? I respectfully think not.
__________________
RAUCOUS SPORTS CARD FORUM MEMBER AND MONSTER FATHER. GOOD FOR THE HOBBY AND THE FORUM WITH A VAULT IN AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION FILLED WITH WORTHLESS NON-FUNGIBLES 274/1000 Monster Number Last edited by frankbmd; 05-22-2014 at 07:12 PM. Reason: The lemmings have left the building. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
So Frank my friend...where do u stand on the "who said there are no good deals to be found on ebay"...thread?
Last edited by ullmandds; 05-22-2014 at 06:04 AM. |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Those new flips are GAI.
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sadly, I think they are worse than GAI.
Who was the dealer who used to make up his own labels to justify his grades - David Festberg? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]() ![]() I remember similar chatter when the last flips were introduced. Bolder green border - how dare they? Adding the website address, removing the gold foil on the back etc. Change is always hard. I guess I wish they had asked the customers first - or had a poll, contest etc. Maybe even give customers the preference to use the 'old flip' for their sets etc. Maybe provide a 5 year grace period for that. I'll wait until I see one in person before deciding. One feature I wish they (and others) would incorporate is the Q-Code (on the back). Those square bar code things. Easy to scan/verify into registries or looking up at shows. I'll still support SGC and wish them the best. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Adam, just wanted to let you know that I got your joke.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I understand that, buy the card, not the holder yadda yadda yadda.....but if you are OCD or like your collection to match, then mix-match flips will drive you bonkers if you are building a set!
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The flip doesn't look as good, that is just the simple truth. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Well, that's one of many reasons I should say. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com |
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Are you saying that we should think for ourselves?!?!?!
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd like to believe we are all independent thinkers who just happen to agree that the new flip design is terrible. It's somewhat insulting that Frank believes we are mindless drones playing follow the leader. I hate the new design because it looks terrible to me, not because others dislike it. It won't prevent me from buying an SGC graded card but it likely will prevent me from using their service, so I find the whole 'buy the card not the holder' argument being thrown in our face by Frank as mildly insulting as well.
Last edited by Gobucsmagic74; 05-22-2014 at 12:31 PM. Reason: Typo |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I didn't read the whole "new SGC look" discussion before formulating my opinion. I saw the change. I thought it was ugly, and I stated my opinion. It just so happened that most everybody else who took the time to state their opinion felt the same waY I did. When I buy a card, I consider only the card itself. Once I acquire the card, though, the flip and slab are very important. The SGC flip + slab combination that has been used up until now was, in my opinion, was the most attractive in the hobby...by far. Now they are changing it. Nobody has a problem with their changing it. We have a problem because what they are changing it to is far less appealing.
__________________
Building these sets: T206, 1953 Bowman Color, 1975 Topps. Great transactions with: piedmont150, Cardboard Junkie, z28jd, t206blogcom, tinkertoeverstochance, trobba, Texxxx, marcdelpercio, t206hound, zachs, tolstoi, IronHorse 2130, AndyG09, BBT206, jtschantz, lug-nut, leaflover, Abravefan11, mpemulis, btcarfagno, BlueSky, and Frankbmd. |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
C'mon. No need for fighting. Let's get back to what we are all in this hobby for . . . the flips . . .
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
#21
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Let me start by saying that I am not concerned about things matching. I have cards in the same run/set that are graded by PSA, SGC, BVG and raw. The holder doesn't have to be uniform for me.
That said. I really don't have a problem with the new flip. I like that it has a simple look without a color border. I know I am in the minority and that may be because of my original statement about not needing uniformity in my holders.
__________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/bn2cardz/albums |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Those new flips are GAI.
Actually the new GAI flips were attractive......their holders and ability to grade was what was bad. |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
That's only for companies that seek to make a profit. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tiger collector Need: Harry Heilmann auto Monster Number 520/520 |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I will give them some props for the red authentic label. I know some don't like it, but I think it helps someone presented with a stack or pile of cards to immediately sift out or hone in on the autographed cards. It draws the eye's attention, for sure.
__________________
Now watch what you say, or they'll be calling you a radical, a liberal, oh, fanatical, criminal Won't you sign up your name? We'd like to feel you're acceptable, respectable, presentable, a vegetable If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.- Ulysses S. Grant, 18th US President. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I also like the red as it will stand out as opposed to the current holders.
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
I agree but I would put a border around it also.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you put a green border around a red authentic it will look like a xmas card.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ill go on record saying that I could care less what it looks like. As long as it doesn't look like a 5 year old did it. I only care what the card looks like.
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
The initial pics did look that way, but the newer ones do not. I agree with you, it's no big deal and would have no effect at all on my decision to buy or submit a card.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 05-23-2014 at 12:29 PM. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
...
Last edited by CW; 10-06-2014 at 10:53 PM. |
#31
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Hahaha I know. I was thinking the border would be red.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
![]() |
|
|