 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
04-13-2014, 04:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
I would value sight unseen
as equal to a nice looking PSA or SGC authentic. Comparing this to the Wagner is a joke almost any startup, in 1992, looking to make a name for themselves would have graded the Wagner. I am not saying it was the right thing to do. However, as this board has exposed may times, the right thing to do is not always what is done in this business.
Last edited by glynparson; 04-13-2014 at 04:18 AM. 
|
|
#2
04-14-2014, 02:15 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
If a high end card currently resides in a CSA holder it is usually because the owner doesn't think it will crossover to SGC or PSA. Of course all TPG's make mistakes but the industry still trusts some and not others, and rightfully so, imo. (that doesn't mean you can look at any card in any holder blindly, so don't)
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Your opinion: would this card get an off center or miscut rating on Cross to PSA??? | Brianruns10 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 4 | 04-21-2013 12:31 PM |
| T205 SGC Power Rating | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 01-27-2009 04:55 AM |
| Rating the Auction Sites | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 12-15-2003 11:03 AM |
Hybrid Mode
