![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Correct, which is why, if you are going to disguise a photo as a card by hiding it in a slab with a PSA designation, you need to point out things that are common with photos, that differentiate them from cards, or that might not be as appropriate to describe for a card. Again, I'm not a slab collector, so this is all theory - you might be right that it would be cost-prohibitive, much as accurately identifying a legitimate autograph has proven to be cost-prohibitive. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be done.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSA Photo Authentication Fees | mybestbretts | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 18 | 03-22-2014 12:57 PM |
PSA photo Authentication | CrazyDiamond | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 02-26-2014 01:36 PM |
Photo slabbing/authentication | Exhibitman | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 15 | 10-28-2013 03:12 PM |
Input on Photo Authentication Course | drc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-19-2009 07:54 PM |
photo 'authentication' service | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-29-2004 06:55 PM |