|
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
I prefer the front of photos to be clean such that the print more accurately represents the original negative taken by the photographer. Extensive editorial masking simply alters the end product of what the photographer was attempting to accomplish in the first place. Henry and many other collectors that I've talked with share exactly the same view.
Nonetheless, there are probably just as many collectors on the other side of the coin that welcome all editorial markings as evidence of publication, etc. In most cases this will not effect the price, although with identical high profile photos, the one that has less or little of the editorial work usually sells for more. This is also one of the major reasons that John Roger's Archives clean the fronts of virtually all their photos. For me , the ideal photo (aside from content, clarity, etc.) is one with a clean front and a back loaded with as much info as possible - date, photographer, news agency stamps, etc. I don't know if it would even be possible to follow the exact history of editorial alterations, trimming, etc for many photos but I can understand why some would like to know. For me, I simply want to be certain of the Type classification and original date and source of the photo. All other aspects of its history are secondary in my opinion. Craig |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But here's a photo I recently received, that shows all sorts of editorial marks, and I think it's kind of cool. I would like to have an un-marked copy as well, but I wouldn't dream of removing the marks from this one:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ Last edited by Runscott; 11-30-2014 at 01:16 PM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Craig |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
PS - that was Jackie Robinson stealing home, in July of 1947. Plan to frame it with a baseball card and autograph.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Scott,
The thing is most photos authenticated by PSA are not slabbed. PSA only slabs photos that are close to 8x10 in size. If the photos are smaller or larger than this size, they are not slabbed. You just the exact same photo you sent in, but with a sticker on the back matching it to the LOA. So, just ballparking it, I would say that less than 10% of photos from PSA are slabbed, so most photos are never hidden in plastic. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSA Photo Authentication Fees | mybestbretts | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 18 | 03-22-2014 01:57 PM |
| PSA photo Authentication | CrazyDiamond | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 9 | 02-26-2014 02:36 PM |
| Photo slabbing/authentication | Exhibitman | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 15 | 10-28-2013 04:12 PM |
| Input on Photo Authentication Course | drc | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 08-19-2009 08:54 PM |
| photo 'authentication' service | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 07-29-2004 07:55 PM |