NonSports Forum

Net54baseball.com
Welcome to Net54baseball.com. These forums are devoted to both Pre- and Post- war baseball cards and vintage memorabilia, as well as other sports. There is a separate section for Buying, Selling and Trading - the B/S/T area!! If you write anything concerning a person or company your full name needs to be in your post or obtainable from it. . Contact the moderator at leon@net54baseball.com should you have any questions or concerns. When you click on links to eBay on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network. Enjoy!
Net54baseball.com
Net54baseball.com
T206s on eBay
Babe Ruth Cards on eBay
t206 Ty Cobb on eBay
Ty Cobb Cards on eBay
Lou Gehrig Cards on eBay
Baseball T201-T217 on eBay
Baseball E90-E107 on eBay
T205 Cards on eBay
Baseball Postcards on eBay
Goudey Cards on eBay
Baseball Memorabilia on eBay
Baseball Exhibit Cards on eBay
Baseball Strip Cards on eBay
Baseball Baking Cards on eBay
Sporting News Cards on eBay
Play Ball Cards on eBay
Joe DiMaggio Cards on eBay
Mickey Mantle Cards on eBay
Bowman 1951-1955 on eBay
Football Cards on eBay

Go Back   Net54baseball.com Forums > Net54baseball Buy/Sell/Trade Section (must login, caveat emptor) > 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2014, 10:13 AM
novakjr novakjr is offline
David Nova.kovich Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 20 miles east of the Mistake
Posts: 2,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Doughboy View Post
He said the price, or best offer

Nothing wrong in my book with seeking the best offer. I always assume it will be lower when I ask for it, but market value is determined by what someone will accept for it and what someone will pay for it.
I think the issue is that when you receive an offer that meets, or exceeds your sale price, there should be an obligation to sell it for that originally listed amount...

Now, I'm not saying that this is the case here. BUT what happens often is that someone submits an offer that may be more just in case they saw it late and someone had already messaged at the asking price.

The way I see it, it should be sold to the FIRST person that offered $200 or more, and not any higher after the fact offers.. Since a SALE price was listed, it should be first come, first serve..

While I don't necessarily agree with how this one has been handled. There did appear to be some unexplained horseplay, where some members somehow turned this into a public auction. So to an extent, if the new higher price is partially attributed to a bit of anger or frustration with the lack of seriousness. Then I get it...

I hope nobody gets rubbed the wrong way by anything I just said. I'm honestly not passing judgment or trying to insinuate that anyone's in the wrong. Just state an unbiased opinion, with no interest in the card..

Last edited by novakjr; 03-18-2014 at 10:16 AM.
  #2  
Old 03-18-2014, 11:15 AM
KC Doughboy's Avatar
KC Doughboy KC Doughboy is offline
Eric Matthews
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,008
Default

David, I agree with a lot of the points you make as a general rule, but I think it's also important to note that no one on this board offered him anywhere near his asking price.
I don't know how he offered the card in other places, but if he is receiving higher offers elsewhere...
-Doesn't he have an obligation to update his message here?
-Isn't it doing the right thing to let those who have bid $50, $52, $60, $100, $130 or whatever low offers they have sent that he is receiving much higher offers elsewhere so he needs to update his price here?
-If someone here said, "I'll take it at your asking price", then he asked for more... Heck yes... rake him over the coals...

Since nothing like this has happened here, why are people so upset? I say JJ did the right thing and has stayed classy by not turning this into a argumentative forum!
  #3  
Old 03-18-2014, 11:38 AM
novakjr novakjr is offline
David Nova.kovich Jr.
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 20 miles east of the Mistake
Posts: 2,269
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KC Doughboy View Post
David, I agree with a lot of the points you make as a general rule, but I think it's also important to note that no one on this board offered him anywhere near his asking price.
I don't know how he offered the card in other places, but if he is receiving higher offers elsewhere...
-Doesn't he have an obligation to update his message here?
-Isn't it doing the right thing to let those who have bid $50, $52, $60, $100, $130 or whatever low offers they have sent that he is receiving much higher offers elsewhere so he needs to update his price here?
-If someone here said, "I'll take it at your asking price", then he asked for more... Heck yes... rake him over the coals...

Since nothing like this has happened here, why are people so upset? I say JJ did the right thing and has stayed classy by not turning this into a argumentative forum!
No, I agree.. I even mentioned that the horseplay with all the silly low offers, and faux bidding war, probably played a large role in the decision to raise the price, rather than sell to the first person that met his original FOR SALE minimum..

"-If someone here said, "I'll take it at your asking price", then he asked for more... Heck yes... rake him over the coals... "

The way I see this, is that someone DID offer him more than the $200(I believe he said this himself). Maybe not here, BUT somewhere. Honestly, I think that person may have a legitimate gripe if he doesn't get the card, given the original parameters of the sale(UNLESS, he was simply taking offers on the other sites, without a set SALE PRICE).. Again, I'm not angry, and could honestly not care less, but this mess here is getting into uncharted territory.. The game just keeps changing..

Last edited by novakjr; 03-18-2014 at 11:40 AM.
  #4  
Old 03-18-2014, 11:58 AM
bigred1 bigred1 is offline
Tim M
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 230
Default

I saw this yesterday at $200, looks like he was offered more twice, according to his post, and raised his price. Just my take.
  #5  
Old 03-18-2014, 12:11 PM
jjcollects's Avatar
jjcollects jjcollects is offline
Jason
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Kansas
Posts: 471
Default

Not one person on net54 offered me anywhere near my asking price. IF someone offered me 200 I would have taken it immediately. The other forum was listed as open to offers and I then received multiple offers for over 200.
  #6  
Old 03-18-2014, 12:34 PM
bobbyw8469's Avatar
bobbyw8469 bobbyw8469 is offline
Robert Williams
member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 9,136
Default

I apologize. I saw the offer, and I wanted to best the offer. If that offended, I am sorry. HOWEVER, raising the price was a NON-classy move. I'm surprised he hasn't made it $300. Would be typical....
  #7  
Old 03-18-2014, 12:47 PM
hangman62 hangman62 is offline
Ralph Gee
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: N.J.
Posts: 1,358
Default 63t rose

OK,
what NOW is the price on this card ?
Closed Thread




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WTB: 1963 Topps Pete Rose jthorst75 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 1 01-06-2014 11:36 AM
1963 Topps Pete Rose MacDice Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) 5 11-07-2012 11:01 AM
1963 Topps Pete Rose PSA 6 sycks22 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 0 11-17-2011 09:57 PM
1963 topps Pete rose rc sgc 98 ichieh 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 8 02-02-2011 04:01 PM
Fs/ft 1963 topps pete rose rc psa 8 where the gold at? 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T 2 01-21-2011 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:53 PM.


ebay GSB