 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1
03-17-2014, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
...
__________________
Mantle Master Set - as complete as it is going to get Yankees Game Used Hat Style Run (1923-2017): 57/60 (missing 2008/9 holiday hats & 2017 Players Weekend) Last edited by Bestdj777; 03-18-2014 at 07:52 AM. Reason: no point. |
|
#2
03-17-2014, 09:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bidding?
Sweet! Maybe you will end up with over $200!
Good luck!
__________________
Always ready to do some old fashioned trading!!! Send me a message if you want to get a trade going. Currently working on: 53 Topps, 61 Topps, 52-55 Redman, 47-66 Exhibits, 53 Bowman color, 52 Topps, 51-55 Bowman, 64 Topps Stand Ups My trading page: http://natesbaseballcardtradingco.weebly.com |
|
#3
03-18-2014, 07:25 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
I had 2 offers from potential buyers yesterday on another page for over 200 so I assume 200 was under market value. Asking price is now at 250. Difficult to place a value on it as they are tough to find in this shape.
|
|
#4
03-18-2014, 07:48 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Kind of funny how you get what you asked for and still are looking for a higher number
__________________
My website with current cards http://syckscards.weebly.com Always looking for 1938 Goudey's |
|
#5
03-18-2014, 08:23 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
LMFAO!!! I was thinking the same thing!
$151 |
|
#7
03-18-2014, 09:54 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Nothing wrong in my book with seeking the best offer. I always assume it will be lower when I ask for it, but market value is determined by what someone will accept for it and what someone will pay for it. |
|
#8
03-18-2014, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Now, I'm not saying that this is the case here. BUT what happens often is that someone submits an offer that may be more just in case they saw it late and someone had already messaged at the asking price. The way I see it, it should be sold to the FIRST person that offered $200 or more, and not any higher after the fact offers.. Since a SALE price was listed, it should be first come, first serve.. While I don't necessarily agree with how this one has been handled. There did appear to be some unexplained horseplay, where some members somehow turned this into a public auction. So to an extent, if the new higher price is partially attributed to a bit of anger or frustration with the lack of seriousness. Then I get it... I hope nobody gets rubbed the wrong way by anything I just said. I'm honestly not passing judgment or trying to insinuate that anyone's in the wrong. Just state an unbiased opinion, with no interest in the card.. Last edited by novakjr; 03-18-2014 at 10:16 AM. |
|
#9
03-18-2014, 11:15 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
David, I agree with a lot of the points you make as a general rule, but I think it's also important to note that no one on this board offered him anywhere near his asking price.
I don't know how he offered the card in other places, but if he is receiving higher offers elsewhere... -Doesn't he have an obligation to update his message here? -Isn't it doing the right thing to let those who have bid $50, $52, $60, $100, $130 or whatever low offers they have sent that he is receiving much higher offers elsewhere so he needs to update his price here? -If someone here said, "I'll take it at your asking price", then he asked for more... Heck yes... rake him over the coals... Since nothing like this has happened here, why are people so upset? I say JJ did the right thing and has stayed classy by not turning this into a argumentative forum! |
|
#10
03-18-2014, 08:33 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Stay classy.
__________________
Tackling the Monster T206 = 213/524 HOFs = 13/76 SLers = 33/48 Horizontals = 6/6 ALWAYS looking for T206 with back damage. |
|
#13
03-18-2014, 09:50 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I read his comment to mean... Surprisingly there aren't a ton of sales prices listed on a comparable '63 Rose RC. Last edited by KC Doughboy; 03-18-2014 at 10:57 AM. |
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB: 1963 Topps Pete Rose | jthorst75 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 1 | 01-06-2014 11:36 AM |
| 1963 Topps Pete Rose | MacDice | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 11-07-2012 11:01 AM |
| 1963 Topps Pete Rose PSA 6 | sycks22 | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 11-17-2011 09:57 PM |
| 1963 topps Pete rose rc sgc 98 | ichieh | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 8 | 02-02-2011 04:01 PM |
| Fs/ft 1963 topps pete rose rc psa 8 | where the gold at? | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 2 | 01-21-2011 09:31 AM |
Hybrid Mode
