Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth
As we know, accuracy in grading is a false precision. I bet I would not grade 100 cards perfectly consistently and neither would you.
|
Exactly Peter. We agree on that. Then why are cards graded using a scale that suggests precision? If you can't tell a 7 from a 7.5, or an 8.5 from a 9 without any discernable objective criteria, then why feign precision? Why not use an adjectival system instead. You wouldn't walk through a museum and say, I give this Picasso a 92 but the Renoir only an 85. That makes absolutely no sense. But given the very subjective system used for grading baseball cards, we have this silly numerical scale. Why?
10-30-2013, 08:29 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode