![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There were at least two runs of black back cards (we know this because there are Sain/Page versions with the correct back and with the wrong back).
It appears to me (and George Vrechek who wrote an article that included this point) that there are a half dozen or so cards from the black back series that were originally printed with "grey" faces, and later without the grey faces. George hypothesizes that these were corrected at the same time as the Page/Sain error (and that's as good as any theory in my book). To my knowledge, the Easter is NOT one of the cards that had a grey face version, and I do not think the card you showed has any variation to it. Cheers, Patrick |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Good info Patrick, do you have a scan or example of one of the grey faces ?
Do you know if the Super 52 set that sold in H&S included any of those. The description says (see Link in Campos thread) there were 91black backs = 11 variants, but does not list them all Last edited by ALR-bishop; 10-13-2013 at 03:50 PM. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've been collecting 52's since the fifties....never heard of gray face cards. ? Dave. Examples please.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's the link to George's article (#4 under what else at the end is the only info on the grey faces):
http://www.oldbaseball.com/refs/5253printing.html honestly, I don't consider this much of a variation. I have a few that are arguably the grey faces but the differences are so subtle that I do not consider them true variations (and both Boone and Kretlow have much bigger variations). I think the Crandall face variation is more obvious and distinct ... and that one is hard to spot too. I don't know exactly what was included in the master set as variations for the black backs, but the Boone, Kretlow and Wehmeier are undoubtedly three of them (in addition to page/sain). Probably the Parnell as well. Cheers, Patrick |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's kind of vague. I gotta see some examples before I believe it. Dave.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree Dave. All of my Black Back cards have a " grayish " face which is a very common trait. In the case of the Easter cards shown, just looking at the front of the cards it is easy to tell which is the Black Back and the Red Back. As to the original posters thinking to grade the Black Back, I do not see the card as a 6 or 7. He should be happy with a 5. Don't waste the time or money to grade the card. Just enjoy it as it is.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are tens of thousand of 52 Topps on ebay right now.....show me one example of this grey face variation among black backs.....I'm calling Bull$hit!
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Quick 52 Topps gray back question | steve B | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 2 | 09-18-2012 05:14 PM |
FS: 56 Topps Mantle (Gray) PR/FR SOLD | Danny Smith | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 08-09-2011 08:32 PM |
1956 Topps Set Gray backs 1st Series Question | bbeck | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 08-04-2011 04:57 PM |
1954 Topps Gray Backs | CharleyBrown | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 5 | 07-22-2011 10:17 PM |
OT (by about 15 yrs) 1956 Topps Gray/White Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 10 | 06-29-2008 03:39 PM |