Babe Ruth?

[rscheck]

Originally Posted by shelly

Interesting people. I asked a simple question like seven other people did. Yes or no would be easy. You came on here and said you would answere questions.

BTW what 7 people asked me anything? I offered to speak to Chris and he left me one message, no return phone number, I PM him told him when I was available and never heard back.....sorry shelly but I am an open book

[shelly]

I never said you where not. I just asked a queston nothing more. I understand you never had to come on here and I give you credit. If you do not want to answere ok with me. Its that simple.

[yanks12025]

Just curious if you remember the lady's name?

[rscheck]

Originally Posted by yanks12025

Just curious if you remember the lady's name?

Honestly I dont. It was 1992 I realize that would make it easier but I dont

[JT]

I must say, this guy Chris is going to look like a big fool if he doesn't produce something factual and provable that substantiates his allegations.

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by JT

I must say, this guy Chris is going to look like a big fool if he doesn't produce something factual and provable that substantiates his allegations.

Going to?

[JT]

David,

I know he hasn't produced one iota of anything to back up his allegation. I am sure he is doing "legwork" deep into the night trying to find something.

I personally wouldn't make such an allegation unless I had the proof beforehand, but that is just common sense to me.

[yanks12025]

Originally Posted by David Atkatz

Going to?

David,
When you found out your 1927 ball was fake, you said you asked a member who you respected lot. Just wondering if that member has offered his opinion on this Ruth yet?

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by yanks12025

David,
When you found out your 1927 ball was fake, you said you asked a member who you respected lot. Just wondering if that member has offered his opinion on this Ruth yet?

No.

[travrosty]

Originally Posted by JT

I must say, this guy Chris is going to look like a big fool if he doesn't produce something factual and provable that substantiates his allegations.

he wont, he's a "trust me because i said so" type of guy. the very first post on this thread was disingenuous, when he asks what others think of the ruth auto. it was a setup from the beginning. he couldnt close the deal though. that would involve breaking the secret oath of the royal order of the scarlet mongoose lodge. if me and mark dont like a boxing auto, we show 'why' every time and answer anyone's questions on why we believe it to be bad. we would supply as many exemplars as needed and asked for and wouldn't hesistate to show why. it called transparency and being accountable. anyone can do it this way and claim top secret CIA clearance.

[Mr. Zipper]

My friend Chris is no fool.

I can't speak to the Ruth. But if this is the work of an active master forger, it would be foolish to publicly announce the tells, and essentially provide a blueprint on how to make a more deceptive forgery.

[David Atkatz]

That bullshit excuse don't work no more.

No one is asking for a public revelation of the "tells."
Why hasn't that info been shared with H&S, so that they can pull the lot?
Why hasn't that info been shared with Jimmy Spence, so he could stop certifying this particular "master forger"?
Why hasn't the info been shared with PSA? (Same reasons as above.)

The answer is quite simple. No "tells."

[jgmp123]

In the end, H&S will not pull the item and it will sell north of $5000. Thy are getting paid twice off that for an item that has been authenticated by the guys they use. They are an auction house and really owe nothing to the hobby, so why waste anymore time with this thread.

[David Atkatz]

Originally Posted by rscheck

BTW what 7 people asked me anything? I offered to speak to Chris and he left me one message, no return phone number, I PM him told him when I was available and never heard back.....sorry shelly but I am an open book

I'm sure you've realized it by now... Chris is an ass.

[shelly]

never mind

[JT]

Shelly,

You asked him this question before and he answered you as I quoted above.

Go to post 270.