![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]() Ted - My opinion that the A+B+C+D not being a hard and fast rule isn't something new. I sent you a detailed email in 2010 explaining why I was skeptical of it. You said it was a lot to digest and that you would get back to me. Between then and now there haven't been the number of new Broad Leaf or Drum confirmations necessary to change my opinion, and you haven't gotten back to me. So for now I remain skeptical and my opinion is moot. Any similarities between the AB350 (No Frame) subjects that were also printed with BL460 is mere coincidence. The two backs were printed with different groups of subjects and at different times. Coincidences between cherry picked subjects, from two different groups, will only lead to false conclusions. Even if Stahl is eventually confirmed with a Drum 350 it will just be a coincidence using your comparison. Last edited by Abravefan11; 04-06-2013 at 06:14 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Cool thread Mr. Z. I love those Drums!
I know have seen a couple of Evers (CHI), but it was well out of my budget. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
Hey Derek Nice to hear from you. Tell your Dad that I will be calling him early next week. Best regards, TED Z |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Philadelphia Ted,
You are a hard guy to track down. Can I please have your attention and forgive me if this is not the thread to ask but are you still set on T206 sheets that consist of 12 cards wide? I recently purchased a card of Walter Johnson (Por) that has a Sweet Caporal 350 #30 reverse with the Factory 30 anomaly at the bottom of the card. My question for you is (just speculation): How many of these Factory anomalies were printed on a sheet? Craig |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
of 12 cards each). If you do a SEARCH you will see that I have posted numerous threads on Net54 regarding my theory. It is logically based on the standard (18" x 24") size sheets of cardboard of that era....lithographic printing press track widths (18" or 19")....and, the factor 12 is congruent with the Series structure of the T206 set. Quote:
I've only seen #25 or #30. These numbers 25 or 30 coincide with the Sweet Cap Factory number of the cards printed on the sheet. The number was most likely printed on the edge of the sheet so that the jobber (who cut down the sheets and packaged the cards) at American Lithographic could at a quick glance identify which Sweet Caporal tobacco factory to ship the cards to. TED Z |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sir,
I appreciate your valued response and I received the info that I was looking for so that my research can continue. Respectfully yours, Craig M. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Sounds good. Don't be a stranger Mr. Z!
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
And, very recently a smaller DRUM find. All of which together contributed quite a number of new DRUM's that were added to our confirmed list. TED Z |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another T206 Matching Set...American Beauty 350 (No Frame) and Drum | Abravefan11 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 07-21-2010 11:30 PM |
New theory why American Beauty cards are narrower than other T206's | tedzan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 53 | 04-05-2010 09:16 PM |
Show us your T206 American Beauty 460 cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 58 | 09-08-2008 09:04 PM |
T206 American Beauty cards | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 09-07-2008 01:42 PM |
Three T206 cards (2 American Beauty backs)-$50 | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 11-05-2006 09:05 AM |