![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Where do you think the value of a T206 Wet Sheet Tranfer should be"? | |||
Less than an example without "quality control issues." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
The same as cards without the extra "markings." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 12.12% |
A slight premium should apply; however, not raise the value dramatically. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 28.03% |
A moderate premium should apply. They are relatively scarce and should be valued accordingly. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
A significant premium should apply, given the supply of and demand for them. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.52% |
I simply do not care. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 29.55% |
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
__________________
Ron - Uncle Nacki T206 Master Monster Front/Back Set Collector - www.youtube.com/unclenacki T206 Basic "The Monster" Set 514/524 T206 Advanced "Master Monster" Front/Back Set ?? ![]() COMPLETE T206 BACK SUBSETS Old Mill Southern Leagues - Black Ink 48/48 Sweet Caporal 350-460 Factory 30 Full Color "No Prints" 28/28 NEAR COMPLETE T206 BACK SUBSETS Polar Bear 245/250 Sovereign 460 50/52 Sweet Caporal 150 Factory 649 Overprint 31/34 Piedmont 350 "Elite 11" 9/11 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I like the WST's a lot, the heavier the better. Even better when it's a WST of another brand on the front than the brand on the back (although it's a bit of a mystery how that happens).
A really light WST is nice, but I like the dramatic ones better. I'd pay a slight premium I guess, depending on the card. Sincerely, Clayton |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I believe there are different types of transfers and that they effect value differently. Some, like Leon's Meusel, can add a premium, while others may add nothing.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
I think "ghost images" are really cool and the strong ones should command a reasonable (strong?) premium. Weaker ones like the following Street, I'm not so sure about -- maybe a very slight premium, maybe nothing. I think "wet sheet transfers" can also be interesting when they are very strong or just curious. I liked the Johnson below because of the detail in the transfer -- but, I didn't pay a premium for it. ![]() ![]() When it is just a hint of an Old Mill that you have to squint to see (like Joss below), then I don't think that they are particularly special. ![]() Last edited by srs1a; 03-05-2013 at 07:18 AM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I find it interesting all the people that voted "I simply do not care". They obviously care enough to read the thread and vote. Perhaps these people should change their grumpy pants.
![]() I think these printing mistakes are part of history and cool even though I really don't collect cards anymore. They are obviously rarer that one without the transfer. I think that the kind of transfer makes a difference though. If it is say a complete ghost image of portrait vs paint marks, it should be of higher premium because it is "pretty".
__________________
[I]"When you photograph people in colour you photograph their clothes. But when you photograph people in B&W, you photograph their souls." ~Ted Grant Www.weingartensvintage.com https://www.facebook.com/WeingartensVintage http://www.psacard.com/Articles/Arti...ben-weingarten ALWAYS BUYING BABE RUTH RED SOX TYPE 1 PHOTOGRAPHS--->To add to my collection |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Mine was one of the "I do not care" votes because I don't collect these and didn't want to skew the poll results with an uninformed vote. I was, however, curious as to the general sentiment, and since I couldn't see the poll results unless I voted... |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Sorry about that. This is the first time I have posted a poll and didn't know folks would not be able to see the results unless they voted. ![]() That said; I appreciate you weighing in here and truly thank you for casting a vote. Best Regards, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
These wet transfer are verry cool.
For me a slight premium is corect. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I was looking at Steve's SC image in the 15 pocket page, and wondering if that was an old 15 pocket page. I recall buying these sleeves and seeing them promoted as "acid free, no PVC" and thought if those sleeves were old, maybe that transfer was from the acid or PVC in the plastic?
The Chase dark cap Sov.460 I have has an EPDG image on the front (I've posted it before), for some reason I can't post the photo anymore. It's hard for me to imagine it's from being stacked, because there's no bleeding of the ink on the surface, and no type of WST or colors on the back. Sincerely, Clayton |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Same value as a stock card. These could be a simple means for an unscrupulous fellow to cash in.
Of course it has occured by the apprentice stacking sheets after the print run. Some of the factories were hot and humid places. But also, I've seen this same effect with other carelessly stored, antique vintage ephemera. Im certain where the temperature and humidity vary throughout the year in addition to being sandwiched, the conditions facilitated the formation of these anomalies. Plastic surface of a 15 pocket page and back of a c1900 photo after prolonged storage: Last edited by Ladder7; 03-05-2013 at 08:15 AM. |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ive got to agree w/steve here...way too easy to "create" these...like adding a stamp to a card?!
There are definitely some freaks...like leons...like jamies...that should command premiums... |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great poll Eric. While I find some of them interesting I'm not interested in paying a premium for them.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The evidence you present is quite compelling. ![]() Thank you very much for posting this picture...It is truly appreciated - and, in my humble opinion - adds great value to this discussion. Could T206 WST cards held by many of us be nothing more than byproducts of poor storage...well after the original printing? An interesting question, to be sure. As always, I welcome the opinions of everyone here. Best Regards, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would think it wouldnt be too hard to simulate this? Maybe stack a few beater t206's and put them in a sauna...or use a steamer on them and see if it bleeds.
If i had some id try it! Anyone have a sauna at home? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Wetsheet Transfers | MurrayMike78 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-28-2012 06:09 PM |
T206 offset transfers - A change of opinion | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-12-2012 08:55 AM |
t206 "wet transfers": your current view | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 08-29-2012 09:48 PM |
WTB/T: T206 wet transfers | atx840 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-06-2011 10:49 AM |
Informal Hall of Fame Opinion Poll | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 109 | 07-15-2010 03:09 PM |