![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
View Poll Results: Where do you think the value of a T206 Wet Sheet Tranfer should be"? | |||
Less than an example without "quality control issues." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
The same as cards without the extra "markings." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
16 | 12.12% |
A slight premium should apply; however, not raise the value dramatically. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
37 | 28.03% |
A moderate premium should apply. They are relatively scarce and should be valued accordingly. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 14.39% |
A significant premium should apply, given the supply of and demand for them. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 1.52% |
I simply do not care. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
39 | 29.55% |
Voters: 132. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Same value as a stock card. These could be a simple means for an unscrupulous fellow to cash in.
Of course it has occured by the apprentice stacking sheets after the print run. Some of the factories were hot and humid places. But also, I've seen this same effect with other carelessly stored, antique vintage ephemera. Im certain where the temperature and humidity vary throughout the year in addition to being sandwiched, the conditions facilitated the formation of these anomalies. Plastic surface of a 15 pocket page and back of a c1900 photo after prolonged storage: Last edited by Ladder7; 03-05-2013 at 08:15 AM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Ive got to agree w/steve here...way too easy to "create" these...like adding a stamp to a card?!
There are definitely some freaks...like leons...like jamies...that should command premiums... |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great poll Eric. While I find some of them interesting I'm not interested in paying a premium for them.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
The evidence you present is quite compelling. ![]() Thank you very much for posting this picture...It is truly appreciated - and, in my humble opinion - adds great value to this discussion. Could T206 WST cards held by many of us be nothing more than byproducts of poor storage...well after the original printing? An interesting question, to be sure. As always, I welcome the opinions of everyone here. Best Regards, Eric
__________________
Eric Perry Currently collecting: T206 (135/524) 1956 Topps Baseball (195/342) "You can observe a lot by just watching." - Yogi Berra |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I would think it wouldnt be too hard to simulate this? Maybe stack a few beater t206's and put them in a sauna...or use a steamer on them and see if it bleeds.
If i had some id try it! Anyone have a sauna at home? |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
Honestly I couldn't bring myself to sacrifice the cards to find out if it's possible. ![]() Last edited by Abravefan11; 03-05-2013 at 08:24 PM. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Depends. The 'best' WST is the ghost image of the card front black ink on the back. Those get big bux and always have. It goes downhill from there. Some print haze from a color on the back I don't think has much value
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
T206 Wetsheet Transfers | MurrayMike78 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-28-2012 06:09 PM |
T206 offset transfers - A change of opinion | steve B | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-12-2012 08:55 AM |
t206 "wet transfers": your current view | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 45 | 08-29-2012 09:48 PM |
WTB/T: T206 wet transfers | atx840 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 2 | 07-06-2011 10:49 AM |
Informal Hall of Fame Opinion Poll | quinnsryche | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 109 | 07-15-2010 03:09 PM |