So why do the Doyle and Magie errors counts as part of the set?

[matthew]

George Browne Washington & Chicago is another. Same picture, different caption. Does anyone beside me only consider having 1 to be sufficient?

[Texxxx]

It was a typical day at the American Lithograph Company. The employees where busy as usual going about regular there job. It is not a quite place with all the machines running but all of a sudden they could hear a major commotion coming from the boss's office. They looked up to the second floor where they could see the boss through the big plate window stomping around and cursing. All of a sudden he flung the door open and stepped out on the catwalk and yelled, " WHO IS THE DUMB A$$ THAT THINKS MAGEE IS SPELLED WITH AN I IN IT?"

[Abravefan11]

Originally Posted by matthew

George Browne Washington & Chicago is another. Same picture, different caption. Does anyone beside me only consider having 1 to be sufficient?

I believe ATC considered Brown, Dahlen, Elberfeld, Demmitt, O'Hara, Klienow and Smith to be one subject with an updated team designation. As a collector I would consider them variations and would want one of each for a set.

The great thing is there is no wrong way to collect. Just create the checklist that fits your parameters and budget.

[Griffins]

I don't consider any set complete without the variations. '14 CJ has to have both Bresnahans, '49 Leaf Peterson, Hermanski and Aberson pairings.
T206 isn't any different.

[rainier2004]

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

[travrosty]

Originally Posted by rainier2004

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

just get a nice reprint or skip the wagner, anyone collecting autographs of heavyweight boxing champions have to skip the marvin hart, because there arent any around. so the set is considered complete without the hart autograph.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by travrosty

just get a nice reprint or skip the wagner, anyone collecting autographs of heavyweight boxing champions have to skip the marvin hart, because there arent any around. so the set is considered complete without the hart autograph.

I hate to admit it, but I bought a nice Wagner reprint about 8 years ago, knowing I would never own the real thing. Still, it is part of the set.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Runscott

I hate to admit it, but I bought a nice Wagner reprint about 8 years ago, knowing I would never own the real thing. Still, it is part of the set.

I did the same thing. I bought a reprint of Wagner, and later got it autographed by Wayne Gretzky. I always get a laugh from people to whom I show it.

[Sean]

Originally Posted by rainier2004

Thanks for the answers gang. By all means, to each their own. Im collecting my Frankenstein CJ set - Currently at 159 1915s, 19 1914 including the Bres no # going for my monster number of 180. I could care less what anyone else thinks should or should not be in my set and its never even dawned on me to ask for anothers opinion as its irrelevant. Is this the point of t206? Are you guys the rebel of the set collecting world? Did I just make a connection to you crazy people? I get it, maybe my bigger issue is I have never thought of a way that feels comfortable for me to do t206s...Wagner really puts a kink in my set collector self....

I don't know much about Cracker Jacks. Do you have the 1914 Mathewson and Del Pratt cards?

[rainier2004]

Originally Posted by Sean

I don't know much about Cracker Jacks. Do you have the 1914 Mathewson and Del Pratt cards?

Thats a negative...I have the 1915 CJs of both. The 1914 CJ Matty may be the most expensive card that I hold out hopes of ever owning as I think its truly an iconic card. The Pratt doesnt do anything for me...there are other 1914s just as rare without all the pub. This is awesome, CJs getting into my first and only t206 thread!