![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Interesting to hear the different perspectives on this.
Doyle and Magie were corrections - you can count them or not count them. There are plenty of other things that were intentionally changed, or 'corrected', in various cards, that don't involves the captions, and no one considers those to be different cards. And there are things like missing red 'B's, 'nodgrass', etc., that are just crappily-produced cards. If you are interested in such things, then collect them - I'm surprised no one has created a new checklist that includes all of these in it (even the odd Marquards, caps missing stripes, etc - anything released to production and not a scrap). My list is much simpler - I want at least one of each player (one Cobb, one Chase, etc) but multiples if I like the design a lot (all three Matty's). Not sure what the length of such a checklist would be, but it's simpler and cheaper to collect the 'mini-monster'.
__________________
$co++ Forre$+ |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Any reason why the two PB variations (O'Hara & Demmitt) would not be considered part of a basic set?
__________________
T206 gallery |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That was how I started. The mini-monster is a gateway drug....
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I think it's interesting that virtually no one ever includes the 8 "new" proof cards of totally different players, that Keith Obermann now owns. Perhaps because they seem to be unique, and probably were NEVER released to the public? I suppose that makes them a little bit different than the Doyle error card - but only very slightly different! When I first heard about those proofs, I figured the "master set" number would increase to 532? Didn't happen.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If I had my druthers I would not have the Magie and Doyle errors in the set. Magie I am more o.k. with because it is in a more abundant supply. On the other hand there are less then a dozen Dolyes. I know supply is not the first thing on collectors mind. I don't see why people would spend so much money just because it says two different letters.
I would much rather have one of those Planks with the missing ink and put the rest in the bank.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/themessage94/ Always up for a trade. If you have a Blue Weiser Wonder WaJo, PM/Email Me! |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sweet Cap (Fac. 30) set-No Wagner, Magie, Doyle & St Lo vars. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 01-10-2013 01:37 PM |
Looking for double names, miscuts, printing errors, proofs, ghost, errors | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 4 | 08-19-2008 03:03 PM |
Survey: How many T206 Magie errors?? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 14 | 05-29-2007 03:44 PM |
"PIEDMONT 1st" Theory - Magie, Doyle Errors, etc. | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 06-30-2006 08:48 AM |
The Magie - Doyle Error vs Variation Caper | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-15-2003 02:44 AM |