T206 Mathewson PSA 7(MC) on Legendary with paper loss, 2nd Time!

[CMIZ5290]

Dave, you are right. If one auction went bad because of this a year ago, why in the world would Legendary not disclose it now? Whoever the new buyer is (with no knowledge about the paper loss), is probably going to back out of the deal like the first buyer, if he's fortunate enough to catch it. If he doesn't, how in the world is this right regarding Legendary? Where are the business ethics in this?? I wish someone could post a scan.

[Peter_Spaeth]

Likely an oversight.

[botn]

Originally Posted by CMIZ5290

I wish someone could post a scan.

I wish YOU could post a scan. When do you think you will learn to do that?

[HRBAKER]

It all goes back to lack of transparency, right?

[Jlighter]

For all you PSA haters explain this.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/150976673138...84.m1438.l2649

[T205 GB]

Originally Posted by Jlighter

For all you PSA haters explain this.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/150976673138...84.m1438.l2649

Thats not paper loss. Hell that a PSA 7-8 all day with paperloss if you crop those corners. Wouldn't be the first time they have done that now would it.

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by T205 GB

Thats not paper loss. Hell that a PSA 7-8 all day with paperloss if you crop those corners. Wouldn't be the first time they have done that now would it.

What is it then? I sent the seller a question asking if it was paper loss and never heard a response. Leading me to believe it was in fact paper loss.

[Jlighter]

Originally Posted by T205 GB

Thats not paper loss. Hell that a PSA 7-8 all day with paperloss if you crop those corners. Wouldn't be the first time they have done that now would it.

I just received a message from the seller, he speculated that it was paper loss as well.

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by Jlighter

For all you PSA haters explain this.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/150976673138...84.m1438.l2649

Jake- PSA is still top dog, SGC not even close, this is on a major auction house that refused to acknowldege twice after admitting that it was paper loss! Nice ethics....

[Peter_Spaeth]

Yeah right they are going to risk what is left of their reputation for one run of the mill card. As i said likely an oversight.

[CMIZ5290]

Originally Posted by Peter_Spaeth

Yeah right they are going to risk what is left of their reputation for one run of the mill card. As i said likely an oversight.

Peter- not when a rep at Legendary said it was paper loss! the high bidder on the auction a year ago, is on the Net54 board. He even asked me about the card when he first won the auction....I listed a thread about high grade T206s with qualifiers, he contacted me after he won this card and I told him what Legendary said....He then called them and retracted his winning bid.

[Brian Weisner]

My O'Leary has a "scar" on his eye where Cobb spiked him in practice... But no paper loss...Hard to tell in the scan.






Be well Brian

[sb1]

Originally Posted by botn

I wish YOU could post a scan. When do you think you will learn to do that?

Damn right click must be disabled!

[CMIZ5290]

still learning...

[CMIZ5290]

any advice would be greatly appreciated!

[Pat R]

Scans