 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10
01-31-2013, 09:20 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Scot - So let's focus then on just the quantity printed with Piedmont 350. I don't think this is a viable reason to categorize the cards into two groups.
The 14 subjects not printed with brown Hindu can be found about or slightly less than 2:1 to those that were. In the Sovereign 460 subset at least 8 of the 46 group 4 (460 Only) subjects can be found in greater than 2:1 ratios to the others. I don't think you would disagree that the Sovereign 460 subjects all belong in the same print group. So if the logic wouldn't apply to the Sovereign 460's, I don't believe it applies to the Piedmont southern league subjects. We actually have seen these types of population variations in other back subsets. I can only speculate as to what in the printing process caused them. Last edited by Abravefan11; 01-31-2013 at 09:21 PM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| FS: t206 groups, HOF w/ tostois too | trobba | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 10-23-2012 01:06 PM |
| Looking for Groups of PSA T206's | longstreet766 | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 06-21-2009 08:38 PM |
| Topps Baseball Stamps - An Overview | Archive | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 18 | 09-06-2008 10:59 AM |
| WTB Raw T206/T205 Lots/Groups | Archive | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 04-06-2007 07:51 AM |
| Grading Companies (Overview & Opinions) | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 22 | 09-27-2004 08:37 AM |
Threaded Mode