![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looking at the right column, 5th up from the bottom.
The e on Babe is connected to Ruth. I am not stating it's certainly an authentic example, but that seems like a highly unlikely choice for a forger to make -- sign the first and last name in one continuous line. In my experience, connections like his happen when one is signing quickly.
__________________
Steve Zarelli Space Authentication Zarelli Space Authentication on Facebook Follow me on Twitter My blog: The Collecting Obsession |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The problem is that ALL the autographs on the left are signed on paper and ALL the autographs on the right are signed on Baseballs. The way one signs a flat piece of paper at a desk is so much different than the way one signs a small 8 inch sphere while standing up.
I have thought this for a while, everyone jumps all over all the signed Ruth balls and claims that a huge percentage of the certified examples are forgeries and they use signed documents as proof. Its Apples and Oranges, or more like lettuce and Watermelons in difference. You dont even hold a pen the same way when signing these two surfaces, if you dont believe me try it. And steel tip fountain pens dig into the soft surface of a baseball if you push too hard and DONT have a more vertical stroke so everything has to change in order to sign the Baseball. I have no skin in the game, I have never owned a Ruth single signed baseball for this very fear and unless I stumble on one from a players estate or something I probably never will. I would just much rather see comparisons from team signed Balls with Ruth signatures (In which context helps prove authenticity) compared to the singles than paper v. Signed Baseballs but hey, what do I know, I am not a "professional". |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
There is no characteristic difference between a person's signature on a baseball, and on a flat.
The pen is held in the same way--just look at photos of Ruth or Gehrig signing baseballs, and signing their contracts. The baseball is rotated as the person signs, so that the pen always makes contact at the same level--just like on a flat. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"There is no characteristic difference between a person's signature on a baseball, and on a flat.
The pen is held in the same way--just look at photos of Ruth or Gehrig signing baseballs, and signing their contracts. The baseball is rotated as the person signs, so that the pen always makes contact at the same level--just like on a flat." I think it's common sense that we sign a baseball differently than we sign a flat piece of paper. Pick up a ball and try it; it's absolutely certain. Maybe more so for some than others, but definitely different. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Autographs Babe Ruth, Jeter, Koufax, McGwire, GW Bush, Bill Russell, Ewing, Darvish | thenavarro | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 2 | 11-02-2012 04:34 PM |
I want to buy your Babe Ruth JSA or PSA autographs | packs | Autographs & Game Used B/S/T | 4 | 10-30-2012 05:00 PM |
Genuine E121-80 Ruth? | glchen | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 05-02-2012 09:42 PM |
1932 Sportoscope Babe Ruth flipbook; Home Run by Babe Ruth anyone know the value | RichardSimon | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 3 | 11-16-2010 01:14 PM |
Babe Ruth / Lou Gehrig autographs | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-22-2006 12:04 PM |