One T206, Two Names

[steve B]

Originally Posted by Runscott

Oh, I see what you are saying.

I described the exact position of each card. If you can think of another position within a column that I missed, please describe, but I think my numbers are correct.

Nope, we're talking about the same thing.


I think the number of each card in the column would be more than 3-4.

with 3 you get
edge card- name and wide blank margin
middle card - two of the same name
upper/lower card- two different names

If it was three, I'd think the ones with different names would be much more common, roughly equal to the edge and same name cards. That's definetly not the ratio we see so far.

Steve B

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by steve B

Nope, we're talking about the same thing.


I think the number of each card in the column would be more than 3-4.

with 3 you get
edge card- name and wide blank margin
middle card - two of the same name
upper/lower card- two different names

If it was three, I'd think the ones with different names would be much more common, roughly equal to the edge and same name cards. That's definetly not the ratio we see so far.

Steve B

Steve, it's an exact thing that can be determined just by looking at Tim's sheet example. Not 3 or 4, not 'more than 3-4'. I don't have the software to draw a graphic for you, but I think I described it exactly in my original post:

Again, per column, 1 physical card with 2 different names, and 4 physical cards with 2 of the same name. Given Tim's layout, it can't be anything else.

Now, if you think Tim's layout is incorrect, then that's a different story.