New T205 Website with Master Checklist

[Wite3]

List is on its way to Ron...hopefully the site will be updated will all the data soon.

Andrew...I am sure there are some Sovereign I might have missed and some rarer backs too that might be on your list.

Plus, I still have some weird missing cards here and there. I know they SHOULD exist, just have not seen a scan of them.

Joshua

[Republicaninmass]

we all have access to the same auction houses and ebay, if cards slip through the cracks, best of luck to those who find them. For the random pick up at a card show, happy hunting, because all the info is out there! I'm happy to share what knowledge I have, and I realized a long time ago, my footwork and time aint work a dime!

[Matt]

Ron & Josh - thanks for facilitating the knowledge sharing on this under appreciated issue. I think one of the reasons the T206 issue has the following it does is because of works like Scott Reader's and Bill's Master Set data. With this data being made publicly available on T205s, it may foster a surge in T205 collector interest.

[Matt E.]

Matt,

As Ed McMahon would say

"High-OOOOOOOO," "You are correct, sir,"

I am all for sharing and more interest in T205's.
Take care,


Matt

[HercDriver]

Joshua --

I've got a list of 123 confirmed Sovereigns if you (or anybody else) wants it. You can find it here:

https://sites.google.com/site/genosb...rds/home?pli=1

Take Care,
Geno

[Ronnie73]

Updates have been made. Thanks to everyone who has contributed so far. Scans that were shared will be used in the Gallery section. I will soon make a list of card scans that will be needed for the Gallery. I feel we are off to a decent start. It started off a little rocky but overall I feel we are all on the same side of things. Again, thank you everyone, and I look forward to doing future updates and additions.

[RCMcKenzie]

Ron,

Just my 2 cents. Do not set up the known cards with people's initials. Just check them off so that all collectors can see what has been found. I had a Richie Hassan 30, which is obviously not a rare back variation, which you did not initially include in your list. I don't even follow the set. People that read this board know Josh has been compiling data on this set for many years. To place your "finds" at 1000 and his at "300" is not going to get more people to post what they know. Cheers

[Matt]

Ron - one additional suggestion - maybe add a total row at the bottom so we can see how many cards are in each back-subset?
Keep up the good work!

[Ronnie73]

Originally Posted by Matt

Ron - one additional suggestion - maybe add a total row at the bottom so we can see how many cards are in each back-subset?
Keep up the good work!

Hi Matt, Good idea. I will work on that change tonight.

[Ronnie73]

Originally Posted by RCMcKenzie

Ron,

Just my 2 cents. Do not set up the known cards with people's initials. Just check them off so that all collectors can see what has been found. I had a Richie Hassan 30, which is obviously not a rare back variation, which you did not initially include in your list. I don't even follow the set. People that read this board know Josh has been compiling data on this set for many years. To place your "finds" at 1000 and his at "300" is not going to get more people to post what they know. Cheers

The original plan was just to use checkmarks but a few collectors asked for credit by card so I decided on using the initials. It seemed to work fine for the T206 master list. I did keep a copy of your Richie Hassan 30 which will be used in the Gallery section. Thank you. The number totals were just put there to keep track of how many have been confirmed so far. This will be changed to card back totals as the previous post suggests.