Are You A T206 Collector?

[T206Collector]

What percentage of Net54'ers collect T206 cards? Let's try to keep it binary -- either you do or you don't. There is no gray in this poll.

[christopher.herman]

Yes...Sweet Caporal backs only.
-Chris.

[bbcard1]

Yes. 520 set

[CobbSpikedMe]

Yes, particularly ones with stamps on the back but they don't have to be stamped for me to buy them.

AndyH

[esd10]

yes just polar bear

[Bicem]

no, too much other great stuff out there.

[HRBAKER]

I have 100+ but haven't bought one in years. So I guess the answer is was but not currently.

[yanksfan09]

Originally Posted by Bicem

no, too much other great stuff out there.

I'm mostly on this side with T206 but buy some on occasion that I like. Am also gradually working on a Yankee subset for them. I don't see myself ever pursuing the whole set. It's a great set, but too common and widely collected for me. There's just too much else to pass up on!

[wolfdogg]

Have had close to 100 but never pursued the set or never will. Great cards but if I collected the set I would want it all.....Wagner, Plank, Magie, Doyle, etc,etc..to me anything less is a partial set or near set....so it will never happen....still have a a few that I'm keeping for PC

[atx840]

Yes, preferably the oddities & HOFs

[kmac32]

Don't see the appeal. Like my black and white 20's cards.

[MacDice]

I picked up around 100 low grade cards a couple of years ago when I was really motivate but since my interest level has decreased substantially. Part of me wants to dump them and go after something different (1933 Goudey) but I just can't pull the trigger.

[brianp-beme]

Never has been a main focus, but over the years if you collect all 20th century Pre-WW2 like I do, the things just kind of end up sticking to the collection as if they were statically charged.

I can't imagine why any collector would not have a few, or at least an example in their little cardboard piles...they are about as recognizable and historically relevant an issue we have to collect.

Brian

[cdn_collector]

When I first got into prewar (nearly 10 years ago), I had great ambitions of chasing the monster. I was building a Giants subset while mixing in as many backs as I could. I only made it about 10% into the set when I realized just how many other issues were out there that clearly needed to be collected

In the years since, my collection has evolved regularly. I'll likely never return to trying to complete the monster, mostly because of the big 4, but there will likely always be a 'T206 component' to whatever I'm collecting.

Regards,

Richard.

[Bicem]

Originally Posted by brianp-beme

I can't imagine why any collector would not have a few, or at least an example in their little cardboard piles...they are about as recognizable and historically relevant an issue we have to collect.

part of the reason they do not appeal to me is because they are so recognizable, owning a couple at this point would look out of place in my collection.

[bbcard1]

Originally Posted by MacDice

I picked up around 100 low grade cards a couple of years ago when I was really motivate but since my interest level has decreased substantially. Part of me wants to dump them and go after something different (1933 Goudey) but I just can't pull the trigger.

I had a lot of the same for probably two decades...then BANG! it hit me and I have been hooked ever since. They aren't eating anything and are certainly holding their value...I would recommend hanging on to them. You can sell them anytime, but you can only sell them once.

[Runscott]

Originally Posted by kmac32

Don't see the appeal. Like my black and white 20's cards.

I understand completely - I used to collect the beautiful colored lithograph cards of the early 1900's, but then discovered the simple black and white cards of the '20s, their images the results of an amazing understated printing technology that results in the same subtle, inexact images that you might see in an early 1900's black and white film. Comparing these pieces of simple art with the more carefully and expensively produced color lithographs of earlier times is like trying to compare 'Pride of the Yankees' to 'The Babe', or for that matter, Gary Cooper to John Goodman.

Sorry, but I just get all worked up when someone mentions those beautiful '20s cards

[tedzan]

The T206 Monster mysteriously has a way of affecting you. This phenomena is best captured by these classic lyrics in the song.... Hotel California .....
" You can check-out any time you like. But, you can never leave "


The following expierences exemplify those lyrics.....and, keep this in mind as you read them.....I am not a rich dude (perhaps, just a smart or lucky dude).

I started collecting T206's in the late '70s. I completed a 521-card set (included Magie) by the mid '90s. In 1997, I sold this set to one of my best friends
in the hobby (member of this forum). I needed $$$$$ in order to acquire cards of other vintage sets (N162, E90-1, GOUDEY's, etc.) that I was working on.
And with that transaction, I was done with T206's ...... been there, done that ...... so, I thought


In 2005, an opportunity presented itself to acquire a T206 collection of 555 cards. These cards were graded VgEx > ExMt, so I could not pass up this deal.
I purchased these cards and completed a 2nd set of T206's (520 cards)......my T206 obsession was back.


Then in 2006, I decided to break-up this set and embark on completing an all-PIEDMONT set. This adventure turned out to be a lot of fun. Dave Czuba was
working on his T206 set. At the Fort Washington Show, Dave gave me his PIEDMONT cards and I traded him their counterparts with other backs. November
of 2006, I had put together a 518-card all-PIEDMONT set.


Furthermore, having won a collection of 262 - SOVEREIGN cards in Barry Sloate's Nov 2006 auction, (plus having 52 SOVEREIGN cards) started me on com-
pleting an all-SOVEREIGN set. At first, this project seemed easy. No "Big 6" and no tough Southern Leaguer's needed. Nevertheless, it was quite a challenge
to determine the 68 additional subjects that were NOT PRINTED with SOVEREIGN backs. A complete SOVEREIGN set comprises of 402 different T206's. Also,
I acquired the 6 "Super-Prints" with their tougher SOVEREIGN 460 backs. Since then, I have gradually been adding cards in order to complete a master set.


Sept 2008, I completed my 5th set (missing only Wagner & Plank). It comprises of 467 different SWEET CAPORAL (Factory #30) cards. I chose this T-brand
as these cards are very available. The Demmitt & O'Hara (St Louis variations), Joe Doyle (error), Kleinow (Boston), Lundgren (Cubs), Magie, Smith (Chicago
& Boston), and the 48 - Southern League cards need not apply.
Hey guys, I recommend trying for this SWEET CAP set, as you'll find it relatively easy to complete and quite affordable (when compared to other T206 sets).


That's my story....yes, I'm an obsessive T206 collector....but, the real reward of collecting all these little tobacco cards is all the great friends that I've made
in this process over these past 33 years.


TED Z

A.K.A. ........ T-Rex TED

[Runscott]

yeah, but there are so many of them

...and they are not black and white

and........YOUNG PEOPLE like them

[HOF Auto Rookies]

No, but I would acquire a signed one if possible...

[4815162342]

I graduated off of the T206 gateway drug late last year. I'm now working (slowly) on the E105 set.

[DeanH3]

Yep...Mainly HOF's concentrating on Cobb, Johnson, Matty, Young, Lajoie and Speaker.

[terjung]

Nope. They don't appeal to me.

[Matthew H]

I'm confused Leon, is your monster number 30 or 45?

[drmondobueno]

Yes, at 145 but running out of cash. Focusing on HOF.

[DaveW]

No, I prefer cards with photos or at least a writeup about the player (some stats, hometown, batting average, something).

[peterb69]

Yes. But my primary set to collect is T205

[Den*nis O*Brien]

My number is, very modestly, at 61 cards. All Chicago players except for an Ed Willett that I don't remember how it got included. I just need a few of the Tinker, Evers and Chance variations to make my goal.

[ChiSoxFan]

Yes, but only White Sox.

ChiSoxFan