 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20
01-15-2012, 09:23 PM
|
||||
|
||||
difference
It's just my guess that this example shown had some kind of chemical put onto it after the printing process. I don't know when, but that being said, and the fact it's considered altered, means it's not a factory product like a printers scrap I would normally think of. I am at the low end of the totem pole on knowing all of the printing nuances. I just don't consider an altered-after-the-fact card as in the same category as a regular printers scrap.
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| T206 "A" PLANK in rea...printer's scrap? | mrvster | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 04-14-2011 05:10 PM |
| FS: 1920 World Series Scrap Book (SOLD) | Rob D. | Baseball Memorabilia B/S/T | 0 | 11-14-2010 05:59 PM |
| Wtb: T206 printer scrap | mrvster | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 11-13-2009 10:31 AM |
| OT- Is this jockey with dog card a scrap? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 12-01-2006 02:09 PM |
| To: Tobacco "error and printer scrap" collectors | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 06-07-2004 05:34 PM |
Threaded Mode