![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ebay purchase - technical grade is correct. Tickled to own it
![]() Post your “Nice for the Grade” card. Last edited by wondo; 04-22-2025 at 03:57 PM. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It "feels" trimmed to me
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don’t get that vibe examining it under 15x. Spider wrinkles top left.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
little wrinkles on the upper left edge about ear high, I'm assuming. Gorgeous card!
__________________
Check out https://www.thecollectorconnection.com Always looking for consignments 717.327.8915 We sell your less expensive pre-war cards individually instead of in bulk lots to make YOU the most money possible! and Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/thecollectorconnectionauctions |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Beautiful 3! Or 6 even.
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/calvindog/sets |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Stunner for a three, or a six. Wish I saw that first John, lol.
![]()
__________________
- Justin D. Player collecting - Lance Parrish, Jim Davenport, John Norlander. Successful B/S/T with - Highstep74, Northviewcats, pencil1974, T2069bk, tjenkins, wilkiebaby11, baez578, Bocabirdman, maddux31, Leon, Just-Collect, bigfish, quinnsryche...and a whole bunch more, I stopped keeping track, lol. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 210/520 : 40.1% |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
It must have a crease or wrinkle somewhere.... No?
__________________
Be sure to subscribe to my YouTube Channel, The Stuff Of Greatness. New videos are uploaded every week... https://www.youtube.com/@tsogreatness/videos |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
We need a 'Heat Map'....
Last edited by jp1216; 04-23-2025 at 12:05 PM. Reason: Map not Index |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I always thought this one looked awfully nice for a 3:
![]() ![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yeah, wow -- compare that to this 3 ...
__________________
__________________ • Collecting Indianapolis-related pre-war and rare regionals, along with other vintage thru '80s • Successful deals with Kingcobb, Harford20, darwinbulldog, iwantitiwinit, helfrich91, kaddyshack, Marckus99, D. Bergin, Commodus the Great, Moonlight Graham, orioles70, adoo1, Nilo, JollyElm |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
No Creases - No Wrinkles
__________________
Lonnie Nagel T206 : 210/520 : 40.1% |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My prized 48. Very small pen line on the back.
![]()
__________________
I have done deals with many of the active n54ers. Sometimes I sell cool things that you don't see every day. My Red Schoendienst collection- https://imageevent.com/lucas00/redsc...enstcollection |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I love threads like this, John.
52 Red Man Mays and 62 Mays have wrinkles. 71 Aaron has a dent on the bottom right edge. The rest just feel a grade or two underappreciated... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Bought from: orioles93, JK, Chstrite, lug-nut, Bartholomew_Bump_Bailey, IgnatiusJReilly, jb67, dbfirstman, DeanH3, wrm, Beck6 Sold to: Sean1125, sayitaintso, IgnatiusJReilly, hockeyhockey, mocean, wondo, Casey2296, Belfast1933, Yoda, Peter_Spaeth, hxcmilkshake, kaddyshack, OhioCardCollector, Gorditadogg, Jay Wolt, ClementeFanOh, JollyElm, EddieZ, 4reals, uyu906 |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I see the wrinkles that go across the card. Great eye appeal but as was posted, it does give off a vibe of being trimmed. Top edge especially but could just be the way it scanned.
__________________
( h @ $ e A n + l e y |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let me begin by saying I really like SGC. However, there are two things I find annoying - the absence of explanations behind the grade, and the inconsistencies. I recently submitted a really nice '64 Topps HOFer. SGC graded it a 4. I cracked it out and immediately resubmitted it to SGC and it came back a 7. That's just plain ridiculous.
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
+1....There is no way a card should jump 3 grades. SGC should have been apologizng instead of taking more money. Unless you are going for a registry set there isn't a ton of reason to buy high grade instead of high visual appeal.
The 3 originally posted looks like a 5-7 any day of the week. Quote:
__________________
Leon Luckey www.luckeycards.com Last edited by Leon; 04-24-2025 at 07:47 AM. |
#18
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Great card John, I’d thrilled to own a stunning lower grade example as that
__________________
Successful Transactions: Leon, Ted Z, Calvindog, milkit1, thromdog, dougscats, Brian Van Horn, nicedocter, greenmonster66, megalimey, G1911 (I’m sure I’m missing some quality members) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That is an awesome looking 3. Congrats.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That Greenberg is sharp!
Might be a good candidate to re-submit again, albeit other $15 handed over to SGC... The classic, "buy the card and not the grade" rings in my head for this Greenberg.
__________________
__________________ M@tt G@lvin Current Runs: 1956 Topps HOF Run: 11/36 Al Kaline Run: 7/22 M116 Blue HOF Background: 1/11 Instagram: @StraightRaceCards YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@StraightRaceCards |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That Greenberg is a killer looking 3 for sure. Here is a card that looks great for the grade.
Last edited by jb67; 04-27-2025 at 03:58 PM. |
#22
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
David, I'll say!
Namath looks fantastic |
#23
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
I love low grade high eye appeal cards
__________________
Looking for: Type 1 photos of baseball HOFers N172 Old Judge Portraits Will buy or trade for the above. Check out my cards at: www.imageevent.com/crb972 |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
My contribution, it took a long time to find out why it got a 3 but does have a very tiny pin hole.
__________________
Tired of Ebay or looking for a place to sell your cards, let SterlingSportsAuctions.com do the work for you, monthly auctions. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Jay. The back looks great as well except for a very small scuff which is what lowered the grade.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
What a lovely Mullin 2, all for the sake of a very small piece of paper off the reverse side.
I’d buy cards like this all day long… |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just picked this up in Strongsville! No wrinkles under 10X magnifier. Small scuff on the back is all I could see.
__________________
I have been a Net 54 member since 2009 and have an Ebay store since 1998 https://www.ebay.com/usr/favorite_things Cards for sale: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185900663@N07/albums I am actively buying and selling vintage sports cards graded and raw. Feedback as a buyer: https://www.net54baseball.com/showthread.php?t=297262 I am accepting select private consignments of quality vintage cards (raw or graded) and collecting "want" lists for higher end ($1K+) vintage cards. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always thought this one was undergraded.
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Still don't know why this is a 3.5:
__________________
194/240 1933 Goudeys (Ruth #144, #149, Gehrig #92) 131/208 T205s 42/108? Diamond Stars |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which is nicer 1962T Yaz | Mountaineer1999 | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 16 | 02-19-2023 05:15 AM |
New list of nicer bowmans | sflayank | 1950 to 1959 Baseball cards- B/S/T | 0 | 04-08-2022 11:10 AM |
Which one is nicer? | Rhotchkiss | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 81 | 08-16-2021 04:20 PM |
FS: A few nicer raw T207's | obcmac | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 1 | 01-22-2021 12:43 PM |
FS T206 Lajoie (With Bat) SGC 35 - Nicer | Gobucsmagic74 | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 08-09-2013 05:02 PM |