Quote:
Originally Posted by Pat R
[/B]
I think there's to much evidence that they didn't do this.
|
Well, that's the rabbit hole of T206....
To me there's some evidence they did it with some brands, especially in the 350's where there are shared groupings of prints/no prints.
The big brands, Piedmont, SC and maybe a couple others were probably produced almost continually, while others like the SL groups were probably on-offs at first.
That's why a ton more study of the tiny details is needed.
For example, on a simple one.
The Hindu and original OM Sl players were probably printed from a common set of fronts. If we examine a lot of fronts closely, we will either see no difference making a point for a single front press run getting two different backs. If we can tell the difference, that would almost certainly prove each brand got its own front plates.
There being probable different presses and locations makes it all the more complicated. But the place to start is with the more finite groups.
11-03-2021, 02:23 PM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode