![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
Eye appeal should be the most important element of it for a collector. Who wants a FUGLY card with a silly slab # on it just because it has the slab# on it? Makes no sense to me...
![]() Yeah, that tiny spec of paper loss on the back justifies that grade. ![]()
__________________
Read my blog; it will make all your dreams come true. https://adamstevenwarshaw.substack.com/ Or not... Last edited by Exhibitman; 03-14-2021 at 04:42 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A technical grading question... | JollyElm | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 8 | 10-07-2018 12:50 PM |
I appeal to your desire for eye appeal with 3 appealing cards | frankbmd | T206 cards B/S/T | 5 | 01-31-2017 09:00 PM |
Growing appeal of...eye appeal? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 17 | 06-13-2015 12:36 AM |
Eye Appeal -vs- Technical Grade | ls7plus | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 30 | 05-16-2011 10:06 PM |
Technical Difficulties - Sorry. | hugginsandscott | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-26-2011 03:17 PM |