![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've operated on this theory for a while, but the only players who really move the needle are all-time stars. Eventually everyone else fades into obscurity.
If you're not dealing with the players who were regarded as the top 1-2 players in the world during their career, their cards don't (and shouldn't) appreciate at the same rate as the all time greats. There's no disrespect intended for these remarkable careers, but I don't look at these secondary stars as underpriced. I think their value reflects the fact that they aren't going to be the first names mentioned in a discussion of baseball history (Cobb, Ruth, Robinson, Mays, Aaron, etc.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is there a more undervalued card in vintage? | T_Hamilton | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 81 | 06-30-2020 06:53 AM |
So what do you think is most undervalued at REA right now? | GregMitch34 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 60 | 05-02-2016 01:07 PM |
1920's Exhibits - undervalued or not | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 12-05-2007 05:21 PM |
Most Undervalued set? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 13 | 11-08-2005 04:18 PM |
undervalued cards? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 26 | 06-13-2005 12:01 AM |