 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26
06-23-2019, 02:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Incompetence vs stupidity
This talk about SGC authention is ridiculous. How did we go from card doctoring to autograph authentication? But ok, I'll play too. Fine, SGC authenticators are incompetent. But the one thing I can say is at least the "autographs" were wet ink. But how STUPID do you have to be to authenticate a fascimilie autograph?
http://www.net54baseball.com/showthr...highlight=Cobb 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Historical Figures Mocking the Current Card Scandal | perezfan | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 18 | 06-14-2019 06:58 PM |
| Help with 1967 Ice Bowl Participants. Looking to get signatures as part of a persona | skelly | Autograph Forum- Primarily Sports | 9 | 03-01-2019 10:48 PM |
| Hobby history: The fake-card scandal of 1972 | trdcrdkid | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 02-13-2017 12:51 PM |
| It's turning into a cottage industry..... | Brian Van Horn | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 11 | 02-26-2014 12:47 PM |
| There's new grading terminology in the industry..... | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 15 | 04-20-2009 03:37 PM |
Threaded Mode