![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My argument certainly is not that psa was correct in each instance. I presume that if I sent sgc 15 psa cards, some may come up short. And if you sent a card to psa 3 times you may get 3 different grades. Rather, it is the false sense of security associated with the grading process. Some of those trimmed cards are only a bad factory cut and some of the psa, sgc or bvg "9"s are altered as hell. I am amusing myself with the irony that after 40 years of collecting, I may be submitting my stuff to a 23 year old to tell me if it is "legit" and then taking his word as gospel.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A Modern Objective View of E90-1 Rarities | ScottFandango | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 46 | 03-23-2025 03:53 PM |
FS: 2x HOF E93 Standard Caramel | bn2cardz | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 05-01-2014 07:04 PM |
PSA 8 T206 an illusion? | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-19-2014 05:34 PM |
Objective card grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 29 | 10-15-2004 09:05 AM |
E93 Standard Caramel | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 09-14-2002 07:48 PM |