 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14
05-23-2014, 10:17 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Leon, with respect, telling me "you failed to listen" is pretty impolite. Apparently that applies, I guess, to 4 out of 5 here. They did NOT offer any real explanation for the design choices, just the need to make some sort of changes. As others have shown, changes that reflected more of their current design, with all of the "lines" they want, could be made easily--contrary to what SGC clalms. They were free to choose any type face, keeping the green box and so forth. And the current label itself already has 4 lines of copy (and they've now deleted the bar code).
Last edited by GregMitch34; 05-23-2014 at 10:23 AM. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Response | JP21 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 147 | 09-03-2013 09:01 AM |
| Response to Allegations | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 80 | 07-28-2012 01:39 PM |
| SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 05-31-2007 06:35 PM |
| SGC's Response | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 31 | 11-30-2006 08:27 PM |
| Interesting response to PSA grade | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 11-22-2005 03:35 PM |
Threaded Mode