 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: What do you think of this PSA slabbed Ty Cobb signature? | |||
| It is an exact replication of Ron K's Ty Cobb autograph |
   
|
43 | 75.44% |
| It is a very similar, but totally different autograph as the owner has claimed |
  
|
5 | 8.77% |
| Undecided |
  
|
9 | 15.79% |
| Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#20
04-11-2012, 10:30 AM
|
||||
|
||||
Any logical person would come to the conclusion that it's a photocopy of the original. There's no way that every nuance of the original signature could be perfectly replicated in that fashion.
Any disagreement here lies within the semantics of the "Master Forger" statement. Does "master forger" imply it was actually drawn by hand? Or that the forger possesses state of the art technology to replicate the signature onto another piece of paper (and make it look like ink from a pen?) Any claim that it was hand-drawn is preposterous, as this is simply an impossibility. So for me, it comes down to a semantics issue (or an interpretation of PSA's wording). 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kreindler's Cobb Stealing Third | Kawika | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 6 | 10-05-2009 02:03 PM |
| WTB: E95 Cobb or Plank, or E102 Cobb (standing), E90-1 Speaker or Young, E93 Matty | Kotton King | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 0 | 09-11-2009 09:44 AM |
| Is this Cobb legit or a reprint? | HOFAUTOS | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 09-04-2009 08:54 AM |
| WTT: My E98 Cobb for your T206 Cobb | Comiskey | Tobacco (T) cards, except T206 B/S/T | 0 | 08-25-2009 04:59 PM |
| Cobb w/ Cobb Back Wet Sheet Transfer | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 8 | 03-25-2008 01:09 PM |
Threaded Mode