No, milquetoast and gentle are my own wordings. actually i agree with you. i was referring to what it would take for others to see it as a mainstream or reputable site, not what an actual mainstream, reputable tpa criticism site would entail. but anytime anyone digs deep and really critiques tpa's. it will instantly be known as a troublemaker site. You can't be friends of these tpa's or try to do them a favor by helping them get better when they don't want to do so and they just want you to go away.
any credible, or mainstream critiquing site of a tpa will not be considered such on day one that they post their first critique.
it will be instantly bashed as being meanspirited, wrongheaded, mean, troublemaker, etc. by the people that don't want anything to change.
so there really is not going to be any site that is known as the reputable criticism site of TPA's, because even the people here that love and defend TPA's will call it
'bashing' or my favorite "cherrypicking"
apologies from me. i didnt want to take any words you said and transfer them to my own and put words in anyone elses mouth.
Last edited by travrosty; 02-23-2012 at 11:32 AM.
|
02-23-2012, 11:20 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode