![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
In which of these situations, if any, do I need to dislose?
1. I buy a raw card I suspect is trimmed. I think if I bury it within a submission I can get it through. A TPG grades it. 2. I buy a PSA 8. I don't like the looks of it, suspect strongly it's trimmed. I put it back out for sale. 3. I buy an SGC 92. I submit it to PSA in the holder to cross, PSA rejects it for evidence of trimming. I put it back out for sale. 4. I buy an SGC 88. I submit it to PSA in the holder to cross. PSA declines on min. grade grounds. I put it back out for sale. Someone then asks me, did you try to cross it.
__________________
Net 54-- the discussion board where people resent discussions. ![]() My avatar is a sketch by my son who is an art school graduate. Some of his sketches and paintings are at https://www.jamesspaethartwork.com/ Last edited by Peter_Spaeth; 02-06-2018 at 03:30 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Perhaps the most unethical thing I've seen in our hobby. Topps should be ashamed | the 'stache | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 72 | 11-07-2014 10:45 AM |
Blatantly Hacked and Kudos to Rob Lifson PSA should be ashamed! | danmckee | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 75 | 04-15-2013 06:12 PM |