 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
04-28-2017, 09:38 AM
|
|||
|
|||
I've collected T206 for 25 years. There is without a doubt a variance on sizes...With that said, personally, for me, I try to avoid cards this "short/small". Might not be trimmed, but it would be in the back of my mind that it could be...also, regarding the diamond cut...who's to say that if someone could successfully trim one edge, that they couldn't trim the opposite edge to create a diamond cut look?
I see A LOT of short cards in SGC and PSA holders, I try to avoid those. Last edited by MVSNYC; 04-28-2017 at 09:39 AM. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Size Variation of 1953 Bowman Color | Wichita | Postwar Baseball Cards Forum (Pre-1980) | 0 | 12-20-2011 11:25 AM |
| t206 size? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 05-20-2006 03:42 PM |
| M101-2's - size variation? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 03-18-2006 09:48 AM |
| How come with every size variation, the smaller card always has sharper corners? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 27 | 01-21-2002 05:01 PM |
| Card Size Variation | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 6 | 09-19-2001 08:40 PM |
Threaded Mode