 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Were these guys the best of their time or not | |||
| Barry Bonds was one of the best of his time |
   
|
73 | 65.18% |
| Barry bonds was NOT one of the best of his time |
  
|
20 | 17.86% |
| Roger Clemens was one of the best of his time |
  
|
80 | 71.43% |
| Roger Clemens was NOT one of the best of his time |
  
|
14 | 12.50% |
| Gary sheffield was one of the best of his time |
  
|
16 | 14.29% |
| Gary sheffield was NOT one of the best of his time |
  
|
71 | 63.39% |
| derek jeter was one of the best of his time |
|
79 | 70.54% |
| derek jeter was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
19 | 16.96% |
| cal ripken jr was one of the best of his time |
|
74 | 66.07% |
| cal ripken jr was NOT one of the best of his time |
|
26 | 23.21% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
05-24-2013, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not totally fair since Bonds best seasons was after his first 12 and Pujols seems to be done as a top-tier ball player. The bigger problem is comparing the old stars to todays stars, its not fair. Humans have grown and evolved over the last 100 years. Take the top 10 players of 2013 put them in a time machine to play the top 10 players of 1913 and the old timers get clobbered. Just like if you did the same with football or basketball players. 
|
|
|
Threaded Mode