 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who's Your Vote | |||
| Barry Bonds |
   
|
56 | 34.36% |
| Craig Biggio |
  
|
103 | 63.19% |
| Sammy Sosa |
  
|
13 | 7.98% |
| Mark McGwire |
  
|
25 | 15.34% |
| Roger Clemens |
  
|
52 | 31.90% |
| Curt Schilling |
  
|
31 | 19.02% |
| Mike Piazza |
|
95 | 58.28% |
| Jeff Bagwell |
|
37 | 22.70% |
| Edgar Martinez |
|
30 | 18.40% |
| Lee Smith |
|
34 | 20.86% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
01-10-2013, 09:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Yes, 1987 was the juiced ball year. Everyone hit crazy power numbers in '87, but most settled back to normalcy the very next year. I truly believe that year was a case of the ball being altered (wound tighter or made lighter or whatever they did) than anything the players were taking, because the power numbers increased across the board.
If there are PED users in the HOF currently, my money is on Rickey Henderson or Dennis Eckersley, with their time in Oakland around Canseco. That is just a hunch though, I've never seen or read anything to substantiate that theory. 
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I need your vote!!! | theantiquetiger | Net54baseball Sports (Primarily) Vintage Memorabilia Forum incl. Game Used | 4 | 07-20-2010 12:06 PM |
| Vote!!! | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 482 | 11-09-2008 04:05 PM |
| Now you can vote on #755 too | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 0 | 09-20-2007 09:41 AM |
| HOF vote in | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 63 | 01-12-2006 12:43 AM |
| Can we vote? | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 4 | 05-07-2004 12:16 AM |
Threaded Mode