 |
|
||||||
 |
|
|||||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
||||||
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7
02-14-2010, 01:05 PM
|
||||
|
||||
some of the reprints are getting pretty good to the point where the only way you can tell its a reprint (when looking at it online) is that the font at the bottom front of the card is a little off. If these people can get the rest of the card so exact, why aren't they scanning the font so that it too is exact?
Hopefully one can tell when holding the card that it is a reprint, such as the paper feels different or a black light makes it fluoresce. Otherwise it'll be difficult for the average collector to tell the difference. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| E98 OLD PUT Backed Survey | Tim Kindler | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 35 | 05-21-2025 05:25 PM |
| E98 Old Put Grading Question | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 3 | 03-30-2007 02:20 PM |
| 2 e94's and e98 one with OLD PUT overprint | Archive | Pre-WWII cards (E, D, M, etc..) B/S/T | 1 | 11-21-2005 11:39 AM |
| E98 Old Put tobacco | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 7 | 01-22-2005 10:50 PM |
| E98 Old Put Players | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 12 | 11-20-2002 05:48 PM |
Threaded Mode