![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Even though it naturally has a lot of great qualities, I would've guessed that the combo bottom right corner and t/b centering would have taken it down to a 6 max to start with. And then that wrinkling would've meant a best case 3.5, and most likely 2.5/3
I'd return it. Edit: Can see the posters above feel differently. I don't doubt there could be some exceptions out there, but I cannot remember ever seeing a "noticeably creased" PSA 4 (unless you're referring to slight small corner folds), much less multiple ones. And have always felt something getting a 4 is usually the typical corner/edge/centering issues that go with the territory of a midgrade card, so I would have expected the downgrade to be from minor edge issues somewhere that you couldn't easily see or something like that. I totally disagree with so much slack being given to that Berra getting that high of a grade. Last edited by cardsagain74; 05-22-2020 at 02:42 PM. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SGC Grading | Yoda | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 5 | 01-30-2016 08:13 PM |
Card Grading vs. Autograph Grading | scooter729 | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 9 | 08-20-2014 12:52 PM |
Mint Grading, or is it the grading of mints? | brianp-beme | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 2 | 10-30-2010 09:11 AM |
GAI Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 16 | 06-03-2006 06:33 PM |
PRO Grading | Archive | Net54baseball Vintage (WWII & Older) Baseball Cards & New Member Introductions | 1 | 04-17-2006 11:04 AM |