I agree with you David. So far, I feel PWCC has done the right things to make things as right as they can be.
A lot of the other stuff seems to be guys whining over speculating and losing money. Just not a ton of sympathy out there for that. On the other hand, if fraud or lies are proven against anyone, things can change. But I spoke with PWCC quite some time ago about the card in question. If I recall correctly I told them, if it were me, I think the deal should be undone at the buyer's discretion. It has been and still the griping and conspiracies..oy vey..move onto the next speculation...
..And I think it's good it came off the pop report (if it did) and it's not in that holder any longer. That being said, to me it didn't look like any worse of a grade than I have seen on a daily basis.
How is that for an underhanded compliment and back-stab in the same fell swoop?
**of course PWCC is an advertiser but it's not like they are being protected, this is just my opinion so far....
Quote:
Originally Posted by vintagetoppsguy
Peter, I think you're trying to make the situation more complicated than it is. Perhaps it really was sent in for a review, but PSA didn't know the controversy surrounding it at the time? Then later, after the card was already sent back, they were made aware of it and decided to get the card off the market?
If it really was sent in for a review, it was probably overnighted, PSA spent all of 3 minutes looking at it, then it was probably mailed back the same day.
IDK, maybe your conspiracy theory is better than my logical explanation?
|
04-28-2017, 11:35 AM
Similar Threads
Threaded Mode